top of page

The Life and Crimes of Eugenia Falleni: A Complex Legacy

Updated: Sep 7


Two black-and-white mugshots of the same person, serious expression, wearing a suit on the left and a buttoned coat on the right. Text: "E. Falleni".

Eugenia Falleni’s life is one of the most complex and debated stories in Australia’s early 20th-century history. Born in Italy in 1875, Falleni later lived under the name Harry Crawford, navigating life in Sydney at a time when living outside rigid gender roles was nearly impossible. In 1920, Falleni stood trial for the murder of their wife, Annie Birkett, a case that drew immense public attention and turned Falleni into a figure of fascination, scandal, and misunderstanding.


The story of Falleni continues to intrigue because it does not fit neatly into the categories of the time — nor, perhaps, into ours. What emerges is not just a tale of crime, but of survival, gender identity, and the limitations of the society in which they lived.



Early Life and Identity

Assigned female at birth, Falleni expressed a preference for living as male from an early age. As a young adult, they left Italy for New Zealand, eventually arriving in Australia. One oft-repeated account claims that Falleni disguised themselves as a cabin boy aboard a Norwegian ship, travelling across the Pacific and visiting ports like Honolulu, Suva, and Papeete.


Some of these stories may be more folklore than fact, exaggerated by reporters eager to portray Falleni as a colourful rogue. What is certain is that by the time they arrived in Sydney, Falleni was pregnant, a revelation that complicated efforts to continue living as a man in a conservative society.


Black and white mugshot of an individual with short dark hair, neutral expression. Text above reads "E.FALLENI". Dark background.


Gender, Survival, and Marriage

When questioned years later, Falleni explained that presenting as a man was partly a survival strategy. In an interview with detectives, they reportedly said they believed it was “better to give up life as a woman, because [women] worked for long hours for a small wage.” Living as a man allowed them access to better jobs, greater freedom, and autonomy in a society that heavily restricted women’s opportunities.



But Falleni’s decision also went beyond economics. They entered into two marriages with women, suggesting that their relationships were not only practical but also emotional and intimate. At the time, there was no framework to describe what we might now recognise as transgender identity. Falleni, facing the risk of public scandal or criminalisation, explained their choices in practical terms rather than personal ones.


Mugshot of Eugene Falleni from 1928, featuring front and side views. Document includes personal details and conviction for murder.

The Question of “Sexual Inversion”

At the time of Falleni’s trial, the term “sexual invert” was often used to describe individuals whose lives and desires did not conform to the heteronormative standards of the day. This label, considered a pathological condition, was invoked during the trial, most notably by Falleni’s barrister, Archibald McDonnell. He made vague allusions to Falleni being an “invert,” even pointing out that they had “the masculine angle of the arms.” However, the judge, apparently confused by the barrister’s line of questioning, asked if McDonnell was attempting to make an insanity plea. This confusion highlighted the lack of clear understanding at the time about whether “sexual inversion” was related to one’s sexuality, physiology, or mental state.


Brown, cylindrical artifact on white padding with label "JP99/184" on a gray surface.
Eugenia Falleni’s dildo, wood and leather, Courtesy of the Crime Museum, Sidney, Australia.

Historian Ruth Ford has argued that the Crown avoided pursuing this line of questioning because it might have undermined their case. Rather than exploring Falleni’s identity, prosecutors chose to frame them as a fraud and deceiver — labels that carried more weight with the jury.



The Murder of Annie Birkett

Falleni’s most significant entanglement with the law began with their relationship with Annie Birkett, a widowed mother whom they met while working for Dr. G. R. C. Clarke in Wahroonga, northern Sydney. Birkett and Falleni were married in 1913, and the couple lived together for several years, with Birkett apparently unaware of Falleni’s assigned gender. According to testimony, it was only in 1917, after a neighbour disclosed the truth, that Birkett confronted Falleni about their biological sex.


Vintage portrait of a woman in a high-collared white dress, with elaborate hair. Background is sepia-toned, conveying a formal, serene mood.
Annie Birkett

Their relationship unravelled shortly thereafter, culminating in Birkett’s death under mysterious circumstances. On 1 October 1917, the couple went on a picnic near the Lane Cove River, during which a confrontation allegedly ensued. Falleni later claimed that during this argument, Birkett slipped, hit her head on a rock, and died. Fearing exposure, Falleni panicked and attempted to burn the body to prevent identification. For the next three years, Falleni lived under the shadow of suspicion, telling Birkett’s son that his mother had run off with another man.


Young boy in a sailor suit with a dark tie and hat, sitting against a sepia-toned background. His expression is calm and neutral.
Harry Birkett, Annie's son.

Arrest and Trial

Birkett’s charred remains were discovered shortly after her death, but the body was initially unidentified. It wasn’t until 1920, after Birkett’s son came forward with suspicions, that the case gained traction. Falleni was arrested in July 1920 and charged with murder. The trial, held in Darlinghurst courthouse, was a media sensation, with Falleni’s gender identity taking centre stage in the coverage.


A person in a suit sits against a plain, dark backdrop. The image has a vintage look with visible text "234, E. FALLENI" above.

During the trial, various witnesses provided testimony that supported both the prosecution’s and defence’s cases. The Crown relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, presenting the fact that Falleni had lived as a man as an indication of their duplicity. The dildo found in Falleni’s home was also brought up, used by the prosecution to suggest that Falleni’s life was based on deception. Yet, as historian Ruth Ford notes, the focus on Falleni’s gender crossing was essential to the prosecution’s case, as it diverted attention from the weak evidence surrounding Birkett’s death itself.


After a brief deliberation, the jury found Falleni guilty of murder, and they were sentenced to death. However, this sentence was soon commuted to life imprisonment, a more common outcome for women convicted of capital crimes during that era.


Man in a suit and hat stands beside an empty chair, hands in pockets, against a plain wall with "239. E. Falleni" text. Black and white photo.

Life After Prison

Falleni spent over a decade in Long Bay Penitentiary before being released in 1931, reportedly due to their advancing age and ill health. Upon their release, Falleni adopted the name Jean Ford and lived a relatively quiet life, managing boarding houses in Sydney. Their final years were marked by relative anonymity until a tragic accident in 1938, when they were struck by a car on Oxford Street. Eugenia Falleni, or Jean Ford as they were then known, died the following day in hospital at the age of 63.


Legacy and Re-examination

Falleni’s life and crimes have continued to capture public attention, with various attempts made to categorise and understand their gender and sexuality. In 1939, Dr Herbert M. Moran suggested that Falleni’s behaviour was the result of a congenital “disorder,” while more recent biographers, such as Mark Tedeschi, have diagnosed them with “gender dysphoria.” Others, like Alyson Campbell, have wrestled with the desire to impose contemporary identities on Falleni, acknowledging that terms like “lesbian” or “transgender” were not available in the context of early 20th-century Australia.


A person in a gray coat looks forward and to the side in a black-and-white mugshot. Text above reads "4.99 LB 332" and "E. FALLENI 21.10.20."

In the end, Eugenia Falleni’s life remains a complex and tragic story, one that reflects both the limitations of the society in which they lived and the ongoing challenges of understanding and representing historical figures who defy easy categorisation. Falleni’s story reminds us of the human cost of societal constraints on gender and identity, and how the past can still resonate deeply with the present.

Sources

  • Justice & Police Museum (Sydney) – NSW Police Forensic Archive

    https://mhnsw.au/justice-police-museum

  • Museum of History NSW – City of Shadows Exhibition (includes Falleni’s mugshot and trial material)

    https://mhnsw.au/whats-on/exhibitions/city-shadows-inner-city-crime-mayhem-1912-1948

  • Truth (Sydney), July 1920 – coverage of Falleni’s arrest and trial, including quotes about “life as a woman” and wages. Available via [Trove Digital Newspapers, National Library of Australia]

    https://trove.nla.gov.au/

  • Sydney Morning Herald, 1920 – daily reporting on the Annie Birkett case and trial proceedings.

  • Ford, Ruth. “Lesbians and Loose Women: Female Sexuality and the Criminal Justice System in Victoria 1900–30s.” Australian Historical Studies, Vol. 31, No. 115 (2000).

  • Ford, Ruth. “Mugshots and Memory: Eugenia Falleni and the Representation of Gender in the 1920s.” Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 13, No. 2 (2004).

  • Tedeschi, Mark. Eugenia: A True Story of Adversity, Tragedy, Crime and Courage. Simon & Schuster Australia, 2012.

  • Campbell, Alyson. “Eugenia Falleni: Reclaiming a Life.” Australasian Drama Studies, No. 50 (2007).

Smiling woman on pink background with "Words By Harriet Wilder, Time-Travel Correspondent" text. Light, cheerful mood.

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
1/22
bottom of page