The Mexican Repatriation: Immigration Raids and Deportations in 1930s America

In the early 1930s, in parks, railway stations, county courthouses and on dusty roadsides across the American South West, families gathered with suitcases that were never meant for such journeys. Some had lived in the United States for decades. Some had never set foot in Mexico. Yet they were told to leave.

Between 1929 and the mid 1930s, during the depths of the Great Depression, an estimated 400000 to 1.8 million people of Mexican descent were removed from the United States in what became known as the Mexican Repatriation. A significant number were American citizens. The campaign was not the result of a single federal law but a combination of local raids, state initiatives, federal encouragement and a political climate shaped by economic fear.

The photographs from this period are deeply revealing. They show families standing in line under official supervision. They show children clutching dolls and blankets. They show trains filled with people leaving cities they had called home. The images are not sensational. They are administrative, procedural, bureaucratic. That is precisely what makes them so stark.

Two armed American border guards deter a group of illegal immigrants from attempting to cross a river from Mexico into the United States on 1 January 1948.

The Economic Context of the Mexican Repatriation

When the stock market crashed in October 1929, unemployment in the United States rose rapidly. By 1933, nearly a quarter of the workforce was out of work. In cities such as Los Angeles, Detroit and Chicago, political leaders began to argue that Mexican workers were taking jobs from white Americans. This claim persisted despite evidence that Mexican labour had often been recruited specifically for low paid agricultural and industrial work.

The roots of Mexican migration to the United States stretched back decades. Following the Mexican Revolution beginning in 1910 and expanding agricultural labour demands during the First World War, thousands crossed into states such as California, Texas and Arizona. They worked in railroads, farms, steel mills and packing houses. Employers had actively recruited them. As historian Francisco E Balderrama later observed, “They were welcomed when labour was needed and expelled when labour was not.”

The Great Depression altered political calculations. Public officials began to frame deportation as a form of economic relief. County welfare departments cooperated with immigration authorities, sometimes threatening families with the withdrawal of food assistance if they did not leave voluntarily.

Relatives and friends wave goodbye to a train carrying 1,500 Mexicans being expelled from Los Angeles on 20 August 1931.

Immigration Raids in Los Angeles and the Role of William C. Hynes

Los Angeles became one of the most visible centres of the repatriation campaign. By the early 1930s, it had the largest Mexican population in the United States. Local officials organised mass sweeps in public places, including La Placita Park near Olvera Street.

In 1931, under the supervision of county authorities, immigration agents conducted highly publicised raids. Families were detained without warrants. Individuals were questioned about their citizenship status on the spot. Those who could not immediately produce documentation were often taken to holding areas.

California mother describes voluntary repatriation: "Sometimes I tell my children that I would like to go to Mexico, but they tell me, 'We don't want to go, we belong here.'" (1935 photograph by Dorothea Lange).

William C Hynes, a Los Angeles County supervisor, defended the actions by arguing that deportation would reduce relief costs. He described the programme as humanitarian, claiming it would allow families to return to “their homeland” with assistance. Yet many of those removed were American citizens, born in California and other states.

Photographs from these raids show orderly queues and uniformed officers. There is little visible chaos. That quietness has led some historians to describe the process as a bureaucratic form of displacement rather than a dramatic spectacle. The camera captures compliance, but it does not capture the fear that oral histories later described.

People traveling to Mexico after being deported from Los Angeles in 1931. The Great Depression stoked accusations that immigrants, particularly Mexicans, were taking jobs needed by U.S. citizens.

Federal Encouragement under Herbert Hoover

Although deportation enforcement was officially a federal matter, much of the Mexican Repatriation was driven locally. However, the administration of President Herbert Hoover publicly endorsed deportation as a strategy to protect American jobs.

The federal government increased funding for immigration enforcement and encouraged cooperation with local authorities. The Immigration and Naturalization Service conducted raids in industrial centres, sometimes working with police departments.

Hoover’s administration did not pass a new deportation statute aimed specifically at Mexicans. Instead, officials used existing immigration laws. Many removals were labelled voluntary departures. Families were pressured to sign forms agreeing to leave, often without legal representation.

This distinction between voluntary and forced departure remains a point of debate among historians. Contemporary records often describe deportations as consensual. Oral testimonies recorded decades later tell a different story, describing coercion, intimidation and misinformation.

People of Mexican descent, including U.S.-born citizens, were put on trains and buses and deported to Mexico during the Great Depression. In Los Angeles, up to 75,000 were deported by train in one year,

Life After Removal in Mexico

For those who arrived in Mexico, the reality was often difficult. The Mexican government, under President Pascual Ortiz Rubio and later Lázaro Cárdenas, attempted to absorb returnees through colonisation projects and agricultural settlements. However, resources were limited.

Many repatriated families struggled to find housing and employment. Children who spoke only English faced language barriers in Mexican schools. In some cases, families eventually attempted to return to the United States, sometimes successfully, sometimes not.

Photographs taken at border crossings show trains arriving in Ciudad Juárez and other border cities. Families disembark with limited belongings. The images are practical records of movement, yet behind them lies a story of identity disruption. For American born children, removal meant losing citizenship rights in practice if not always in law.

Agricultural workers of Mexican descent await deportation

Citizenship and Constitutional Questions

One of the most striking aspects of the Mexican Repatriation was the removal of US citizens. Estimates vary, but scholars suggest that between 40 and 60 percent of those repatriated were citizens by birth.

The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to all persons born in the United States. However, enforcement of those rights in the 1930s was uneven. Legal challenges were rare, partly because affected families often lacked resources to contest deportation.

Unlike later immigration controversies, there was no single Supreme Court case defining the legality of the Mexican Repatriation. The absence of high profile litigation contributed to the relative obscurity of the episode in mainstream historical narratives for decades.

It was not until the late twentieth century that academic studies and state level apologies brought renewed attention to the events. In 2005, the state of California formally apologised for its role in the repatriation campaign.

The Power of Photography in Historical Memory

The photographs of the Mexican Repatriation were often taken by newspaper photographers or government agencies. They were intended to document policy implementation, not to criticise it.

Yet when viewed today, the images tell a layered story. Children standing beside suitcases. Mothers holding official papers. Lines of men wearing work clothes, waiting to board trains. The images do not shout. They record.

Historians have noted that photography during the Great Depression, including work by Farm Security Administration photographers such as Dorothea Lange, shaped public understanding of poverty and migration. Although Lange is more closely associated with Dust Bowl migrants, her images of displaced Americans provide a visual parallel to the experience of repatriated Mexican families.

The starkness of these photographs lies in their ordinariness. There are no dramatic confrontations in most frames. There is administration. Paperwork. Travel.

Remembering the Mexican Repatriation Today

The Mexican Repatriation complicates common narratives about American immigration history. It demonstrates that large scale removal can occur without sweeping new legislation. It shows how economic crisis can influence policy. It highlights how citizenship rights may be fragile in practice.

For decades, the episode remained relatively absent from school textbooks. It survived primarily through family stories and local archives. Only in recent years has it received broader scholarly attention.

The immigration raids of the 1930s were not isolated incidents. They were part of a coordinated effort to reduce relief rolls and reshape labour markets. The photographs that remain are fragments of that effort.

Looking at them now, one sees more than a line of people at a station. One sees the intersection of economic fear, racial prejudice and state authority. The camera captured the moment. History continues to interpret it.

---