Georges Courtois and the Nantes Courthouse Hostage Crisis of 1985

At 10.30 a.m. on 19th December, 1985, the rituals of French justice were proceeding as usual inside the grey stone courthouse of Nantes. Robes rustled, papers were shuffled, and a routine armed robbery trial moved through its careful steps. The building itself reflected an older idea of order and authority. Designed long before modern security concerns, it had no airport style screening, no bag checks, and little expectation that violence could erupt from within its own walls.

Then the door burst open. Shots rang out. A hand grenade appeared. Within seconds, the courtroom was no longer a place of judgement but a stage, and the accused had seized the script.

What followed over the next thirty six hours would become one of the most unsettling and revealing episodes in modern French legal history. It was a hostage crisis, but also a media event, a political spectacle, and a moment that forced France to reconsider how justice, authority, and public visibility intersect.

A Courtroom Seized

The defendants that morning were Georges Courtois and Patrick Thiolet, on trial for armed robbery. A third accomplice, Abdelkarim Khalki, was not expected to play a role inside the courtroom itself. Yet at precisely the wrong moment, Khalki burst in, firing shots into the air and brandishing a grenade. Judges, jurors, lawyers, journalists, and spectators dived beneath desks and tables.

Khalki moved quickly. He stripped five court officers of their .357 Magnum pistols and handed them to the defendants. In a matter of moments, twenty nine people inside the courtroom had become hostages. Another contemporary account placed the number at thirty four. Either way, the result was the same. The authority of the court collapsed almost instantly.

Among the hostages was journalist Dominique Guillet, who would later describe the strange reversal that followed:“there was a surreal moment when the hostage takers became the magistrate and the jury.”

This reversal was not improvised. It was deliberate.

“Now It Is Our Turn to Judge You”

Georges Courtois, then thirty eight years old, assumed control almost immediately. Tall, gaunt, and composed, he appeared acutely aware of how he presented himself. Smoking a cigar and waving a pistol, he demanded television cameras be brought into the courtroom.

“You have been judging me,” he declared with icy calm. “Now it is our turn to judge you.”

At his insistence, the FR3 Nantes news team was allowed inside. Their camera would prove decisive. For the first time in French history, a hostage situation inside a courthouse unfolded live, broadcast into homes across the country.

The visual details mattered. Courtois wore a navy three piece suit, deliberately formal, with sideburns, a moustache, dark glasses, and a sharp, controlled manner of speech. Several observers noted that his phrasing recalled the streetwise dialogue of Audiard. The effect was unsettling. He did not look like a man out of control. He looked like a man performing a role.

Patricia Tourancheau, then a young crime reporter, later reflected:“There he is, a cigar in one hand, a gun in the other, settling scores. He's putting the justice system on trial. And I find this role reversal, this plot twist, fascinating, because later I'll understand why he harbors such a deep resentment toward the justice system.”

A Life Shaped by Prison

Outside the courthouse, police negotiators assembled their response. Courtois was already well known to them. Born in September 1947 into a poor family, he committed his first theft at the age of eleven. By fourteen, he had already been imprisoned. His youth and early adulthood unfolded in cycles of incarceration that hardened his distrust of authority.

In 1974, after robbing a gun shop, he was sent to Angers prison. It was there that he met Abdelkarim Khalki and Patrick Thiolet. Their relationship developed within the confined world of the penal system, where long sentences, limited family contact, and institutional rigidity were common.

During the early 1980s, France’s prisons were under growing criticism. Overcrowding was endemic. Pre trial detention could stretch for years. Restrictions on family visits were severe. Courtois’s grievances were extreme, but they were not invented.

His trial was scheduled for December 1985. It was meant to be another step in a familiar process. Instead, it became something else entirely.

“Tell Your Story”

As the hours passed, Courtois used the camera not only to threaten but to speak. He delivered a sustained indictment of the justice system, describing years of mistreatment, isolation, and what he viewed as arbitrary punishment.

Patricia Tourancheau later recalled a conversation with him years after the crisis:“ I was thinking: you're done for, so go ahead, tell your story, tell your story, get everything you've got in your guts against the prison administration, the jail, the justice system, how they mistreated me for years.”

One exchange in particular would become emblematic. On the first day of the trial, before the hostage taking, Courtois asked the presiding judge whether it was normal to be forbidden from seeing his wife and children for three years. The judge avoided answering. The next day, with the judge now a hostage, Courtois asked again.

“‘Mr. President, do you find it normal that I was forbidden from seeing my wife and children for three years?’ And the president said, ‘No, that's not humane.’ And Courtois said to him: ‘Ah, I see that sleep brings counsel, Mr. President . ’”

The exchange resonated because it exposed a truth about power. The answer had not changed. The position had.

Political Overtones and Dangerous Alliances

The situation escalated further when Courtois introduced political language into the crisis. On camera, he explained his alliance with Khalki.

“He explained his political battle to me,” said Courtois. “Rather than waste my time spending x number of years in prison, I decided to ally myself with his cause.”

Khalki, visibly agitated and repeatedly handling his grenade, went further. He proclaimed allegiance to the Abu Nidal organisation, a violent Palestinian group aligned with Libya. Addressing the television audience, he said he wanted to “give the French state a slap in the face.”

Later investigations found no evidence that Khalki had operational links to organised terrorism. His statements were seen as ideological posturing rather than coordination. Still, for police negotiators, the risk was real. France in the mid 1980s was already on edge from terrorism. The language alone raised the stakes.

Negotiation Under the Lens

More than two hundred police officers surrounded the courthouse, including a special antiterror unit from Paris. Negotiations were led by Robert Broussard, whose measured approach would later be credited with preventing bloodshed.

Within seven hours, almost half the hostages were released, including law students observing the trial and two defendants who refused to take part. Throughout the night, more were freed. By Friday morning, only four remained.

Inside the courthouse, fear was not always immediate. Eric Cabanas of Presse Océan later recalled:“We were never afraid. Even when there was shooting, it felt a bit like we were in a movie. It was something so extraordinary that was happening there that we were never afraid.”

Several hostages later admitted that fear arrived afterwards, once distance allowed them to understand how narrowly catastrophe had been avoided.

The Moment on the Steps

Late on Friday morning, Courtois emerged onto the courthouse steps, handcuffed to Presiding Judge Dominique Bailhache. For nearly half an hour, he paced back and forth, visibly agitated.

At one point, he shouted at police and journalists, “Go away, I don’t want to see you.”

Then he fired four shots toward the crowd. Panic followed. Reporters threw themselves to the ground. A bullet shattered a BBC camera lens. No one was hurt.

“We wondered how this story would end,” Eric Cabanas later said. “We were torn between this somewhat peculiar character, but we had to see that his accomplices were heavily armed. Defensive grenades, firearms—they weren't choirboys.”

A False Escape and a First for RAID

The kidnappers and remaining hostages were driven to Nantes airport, to the Château Bougon airfield. There, further negotiations convinced the men that escape was impossible.

Courtois, Broussard later said, “realized that he was at an impasse.”

The surrender marked the first operational deployment in the history of RAID. The crisis ended after thirty six hours. No one was killed. No one seriously injured.

Aftermath, Memory, and Uneasy Celebrity

Public reaction was divided. Courtois had endangered lives, yet he had also articulated grievances that many recognised. Over time, he reinvented himself as a court reporter for the satirical paper La Lettre à Lulu.

“He was the rebel who defied the authorities,” Eric Cabanas observed. “That always appeals to some people.”

The crisis reshaped courthouse security, police negotiation protocols, and media ethics in France. Courts were reclassified as high risk sites. Live coverage of crises was more tightly controlled.

In 2017, a documentary by Olivier Pighetti reunited Courtois and Broussard, placing them face to face once more. Nearly four decades later, the Nantes courthouse hostage crisis still feels uncomfortably contemporary. It happened before society knew how to manage cameras, crises, and attention. That is precisely why it endures.

---