top of page

Amelia Dyer: The Serial Killer And Baby Farmer.

  • Jun 10, 2024
  • 9 min read

Portrait of a stern woman overlayed with red, blue, and yellow hues. Text: "Minnie Dean: The Baby Killer..." Background has aged paper and handwriting.

The history of Victorian crime is filled with grim stories, but few are as disturbing as that of Amelia Dyer. Her case isn't just a story about one woman's cruelty. It's a story about a legal and social system that created the conditions for mass murder, and then failed for decades to stop it. Dyer operated for almost thirty years. She killed infants for money. And she almost certainly got away with hundreds of murders before a faint name written on a scrap of soggy paper finally gave her away.


From Shoemaker's Daughter to Baby Farmer

Amelia Elizabeth Hobley was born on 27 November 1837 in Pyle Marsh, near Bristol. Her father was a master shoemaker, and for the time she had a relatively privileged upbringing. She could read and write, rare for working-class Victorian women, and that literacy would later prove central to how she found her victims.


Her early adult life was unremarkable enough. She trained as a nurse, encouraged by her first husband, George Thomas, a much older man she married in 1861. George was 59 to her 24, and both of them lied about their ages on the marriage certificate to avoid the scandal of the gap. When George died in 1869, Amelia was left without income and with a child to support.


It was around this time that she came into contact with a midwife named Ellen Dane, who was making a living by lodging young women who had become pregnant outside marriage, helping deliver their babies, and then arranging for the infants to be sent to baby farmers. Dane was later forced to flee to America to escape police attention, but the introduction had planted a seed. Amelia began advertising her own services. The baby farming business had begun.


In 1872, she married her second husband, William Dyer, a brewer's labourer from Bristol. They had two children together, Mary Ann (known as Polly) and William Samuel, but the marriage didn't last. Amelia kept the Dyer name and continued her operation.


Two old classified ads: 'Couple with no family,' 'Respectable Married Couple.'
Dyer advertised her services in newspapers, describing herself as "highly respectable"

The System That Made It Possible

To understand how Dyer operated for three decades without being stopped, you need to understand the world she was operating in. The 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act had stripped fathers of illegitimate children of any legal obligation to financially support the mothers. Young women who fell pregnant outside marriage had no legal recourse, no institutional support, and in many cases no family willing to acknowledge their situation. Many of Dyer's clients were domestic servants who would lose their jobs and their lodgings the moment their pregnancy became known.


Into that void came baby farming: individuals who advertised themselves as adoption or fostering agents in exchange for a fee. A mother would pay a lump sum, hand over her child, and the baby farmer would promise a safe and loving home. Some provided genuine care. Most let the children die slowly of neglect, drugging them into stupor with laudanum to keep them quiet while they starved. It was a brutal trade, but one that existed because desperate women had nowhere else to turn.



The practice had begun attracting attention from Parliament by the late 1860s. In 1870, a baby farmer named Margaret Waters became the first person hanged for infanticide after a child in her care died from neglect. That case led directly to the 1872 Infant Life Protection Act, which required anyone taking in more than one nurse child for more than 24 hours to register with the police. It was a start. But it wasn't enough, and Amelia Dyer kept going regardless. You can read about the grim realities of

Victorian children jailed for petty crimes in the 1870s to get a fuller sense of how the period treated its most vulnerable.


Sepia-toned portrait of a person with direct gaze, brick background.
Amelia Dyer’s mugshot.

Moving from Neglect to Murder

Initially, Dyer's operation ran along the usual lines. She took in infants, collected the fees, and let the children die slowly of starvation and deliberate neglect. But at some point she made a calculated decision to speed the process up. Waiting for infants to die was expensive and inconvenient. Murdering them quickly was cheaper and allowed her to take in more children for more fees.


Her method became a signature. She would drug infants with laudanum to incapacitate them, then use a length of white dressmaking tape, tied twice around the neck, to strangle them. She disposed of the bodies herself, usually by wrapping them in paper or cloth, weighing the parcels down with bricks, and throwing them into rivers. The Thames, in particular, became her preferred disposal site.

She later told police: "You'll know all mine by the tape around their necks."


She moved frequently, changing names and addresses to stay ahead of any scrutiny, operating mostly in Bristol and later in Reading. Among the aliases she used were "Mrs Thomas" and "Mrs Harding." She advertised in newspapers, describing herself as a "highly respectable" married woman who wanted to adopt a child not for money but for companionship. The advertisements were carefully worded to attract exactly the kind of desperate, trusting mother she was looking for.



Caught Once, and Let Go

In 1879, a doctor raised concerns about the high number of infant deaths occurring in Dyer's care. She was investigated and charged, but not with murder. She received six months of hard labour for neglect, a sentence that reflected exactly how poorly equipped the law was to deal with what she was actually doing.


After her release she continued. Over the following years, when police scrutiny increased, she checked herself into asylums, drawing on her nursing training to feign mental breakdowns convincingly enough to deflect suspicion. She was admitted to and discharged from the Wells Asylum in 1893. Then she resumed.


Her daughter Polly, who had married a man named Arthur Palmer, became an accomplice, whether out of genuine complicity or the kind of dependence that develops when you've grown up in the shadow of something monstrous. Together, they carried on the operation.


Helena Fry and the Paper Trail

On 30 March 1896, a bargeman navigating the Thames near Reading spotted a brown paper parcel floating in the water near Caversham Lock. He and his mate hauled it to the towpath and tore open the wet packaging. An infant's foot emerged. He ran to fetch the police.


Four men on a boat investigating a body wrapped in cloth.
A body is discovered by bargemen

The baby was a girl, later identified as Helena Fry. She had white tape tied around her neck. Reading Borough Police Chief Constable George Tewsley put his detective force to work immediately. Detective Constable James Anderson examined the wrapping paper under close scrutiny and found a name and address, faintly visible but still legible: "Mrs Thomas" and an address in Reading. That scrap of paper led directly to Amelia Dyer.


The local residents were so shocked by the discovery of infant bodies in the Thames that they carved crosses into the handrail of the wooden footbridge crossing the river at Caversham. That bridge is long gone now, and there is still no memorial at the site to the children found there.


Collection of miscellaneous items: figure, tangled wires, and wrapped package in box.
The parcel found in the river

Doris, Harry, and the Sting

The police didn't move immediately. Instead, they laid a trap. On 31 March, just one day after Helena Fry's body was found, Dyer agreed to take a baby girl named Doris Marmon. Doris was the four-month-old daughter of Evelina Marmon, a 25-year-old barmaid who had placed an advertisement looking for someone to adopt her child so she could return to work.


Dyer had responded as "Mrs Harding," assuring Evelina she wanted the baby not for money but for the company. Evelina was initially unsettled by Dyer's appearance, older and stouter than she had expected, but was reassured by the apparent warmth she showed toward the baby. She handed over Doris and a payment of ten pounds.


Rather than taking Doris anywhere resembling a pleasant home, Dyer went to her daughter's lodgings in Willesden, London. Using her white tape, she strangled the infant. The tape was tied twice around the baby's neck. The following day, she used the same tape to murder another child in her care, 13-month-old Harry Simmons. She placed both bodies in a carpet bag, weighed it down with bricks, and threw it into the Thames at Caversham Lock.


Three men with moustaches, two in bowler hats, stand behind table.
The only known image of the carpet bag © Thames Valley Police Museum

While this was happening, police arranged their sting. An undercover officer posing as a desperate mother contacted Dyer and arranged a handover. On 3 April 1896, as soon as Dyer accepted the child and the payment, she was arrested.


The Search of the House

A search of her home in Reading produced a scene that investigators found almost overwhelming. The stench of decomposition was immediately apparent, though no bodies were found on the premises. What they did find was an abundance of baby clothing, a large quantity of letters from anxious mothers enquiring after children they had handed over, and the kind of paperwork that only a person running a systematic operation would have kept.


Dyer had kept the letters. Whether as a grotesque record of her transactions, or simply because she was too disorganised to destroy them, those letters became central to the prosecution. They allowed investigators to construct a timeline and link her to children who had vanished. Police dredged the Thames and found six more bodies, all bearing white tape around their necks. The investigation determined that at least twenty children had been handed to Dyer in the months immediately before her arrest. Her daughter Polly and son-in-law Arthur Palmer were charged as accessories.


Trial and Execution

Dyer's trial at the Old Bailey opened in May 1896. She pleaded guilty to just one murder and attempted to use insanity as her defence, pointing to her repeated asylum stays as evidence of mental instability. The jury saw through it. They had heard enough evidence to understand that her breakdowns had been strategically timed to avoid investigation. The jury returned a guilty verdict in four and a half minutes.


While awaiting execution in prison, she filled five notebooks with a written confession. When the prison chaplain asked if she had anything further to add, she handed over the notebooks and said simply: "Isn't this enough?"


Handwritten letter with visible text: 'Arthur oh how my heart ache for you'.
Transcription of Amelia Dyer’s confession, H. M. Prison, Reading, 16 April 1896

Amelia Dyer was hanged at Newgate Prison on 10 June 1896. The executioner was James Billington, one of the most experienced hangmen of the era. On the scaffold, she was asked if she had anything to say. She replied: "I have nothing to say." She was dropped at exactly 9am.


The confirmed death toll from the 1896 investigation alone was six, with evidence pointing to at least twelve murders. But Dyer had been operating since 1869, almost thirty years, across Bristol, Reading, and various other locations. Estimates of her total victim count range from 200 to 400. Some experts have placed the figure higher. She is considered one of the most prolific killers in British history, comparable in scale to Harold Shipman. She was certainly the worst baby farmer England ever produced. For more on Victorian Britain's relationship with crime and punishment, see the site's article on Albert Pierrepoint, Britain's most prolific executioner, or the story of Minnie Dean, the only woman executed in the history of New Zealand, another baby farmer hanged for child murder.


The Victims Nobody Named

Most of Dyer's victims were never identified. The bodies found in the Thames in 1896 were recorded in coroners' notes simply as "female infant unknown, found dead in the Thames." Doris Marmon and Harry Simmons were buried together in Reading Old Cemetery. Their grave is unmarked.


Researcher and author Angela Buckley has spent years attempting to identify the lost victims, tracing the mothers who placed advertisements and the babies who disappeared. She has managed to account for around thirty, though not all can be fully identified. The full number of children who passed through Dyer's hands and never came out the other side will never be known.


What Changed Because of Her

The outcry following Dyer's case was significant enough to force legislative change. Her conviction is directly cited as one of the catalysts for the 1908 Children Act, which established the framework for modern child protection law in Britain. It was a landmark piece of legislation, but it came after decades of systematic murder that the existing law had been wholly unequipped to prevent.


The 1872 Infant Life Protection Act had required registration of baby farmers. Dyer had simply ignored it, moved frequently, and changed her name. The law had no teeth to stop someone determined to evade it. The 1908 Act introduced far more comprehensive protections, including the concept of state oversight of children's welfare that forms the basis of safeguarding law today.







A Folk Villain Immortalised

In the aftermath of the trial, the newspapers dubbed her "The Ogress of Reading." Her story passed into something approaching dark folklore, even producing a grim nursery rhyme that circulated in the months after her execution:

"The old baby farmer, the wretched Miss Dyer / At the Old Bailey her wages is paid. / In times long ago, we'd 'a' made a big fyer / And roasted so nicely that wicked old jade."

The rhyme is a reminder that public reaction to Dyer was not just horror but rage, a rage that had nowhere else to go given that the system which had allowed her to operate for three decades had done nothing until a bargeman found a body in the river.


Amelia Dyer's name has come to stand for the darkest possible abuse of trust in an era when desperate women had almost no other options. She found those women, took their money, took their children, and killed them. The Thames has long washed away the physical traces of her crimes, but the records survive, and so do the crossed-out names in coroners' ledgers that simply read: infant unknown. For another case of Victorian-era criminal infamy, read about Jack the Ripper and why the prostitute myth about his victims is wrong.

.

SOURCES

2. Dr Angela Buckley: The Lost Victims of Amelia Dyer — https://victorian-supersleuth.com/the-lost-victims-of-amelia-dyer/

3. Dr Angela Buckley: The Detectives Who Caught Amelia Dyer — https://victorian-supersleuth.com/the-detectives-who-caught-amelia-dyer/

4. Executed Today: 1896: Amelia Dyer, Baby Farmer — https://www.executedtoday.com/2012/06/10/1896-amelia-dyer-baby-farmer/

5. Crime Museum: Amelia Dyer, The Reading Baby Farmer — https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/amelia-dyer/

6. Ann Marie Ackermann: Amelia Dyer and the Baby Farm Murders (interview with Angela Buckley) — https://www.annmarieackermann.com/baby-farm-murders/









bottom of page