The Thammasat University Massacre: The Day Thailand Turned on Its Students
- 55 minutes ago
- 6 min read
On the morning of 6 October 1976, Thai police and right-wing paramilitaries opened fire on unarmed university students in Bangkok. They shot them with M-16s, grenades, and recoilless rifles. They hanged some from trees and beat the bodies with metal chairs. They dragged students who tried to surrender out of the gates and killed them anyway. By the time it was over, the official death toll stood at 46. Survivors and independent investigators have long believed the real number was closer to 100, with some estimates running far higher.
It happened in broad daylight. Photographers were present. And for decades, almost nobody in Thailand talked about it.
How It Started: A Dictator Returns
To understand October 6, you have to go back to 1973. That year, mass student protests forced three military rulers out of Thailand, including Field Marshal Thanom Kittikachorn, who'd run the country as a dictator since 1963. He fled into exile, and Thailand got its first taste of genuine democratic government.
It lasted three years.
In September 1976, Thanom slipped back into the country dressed as a Buddhist monk, claiming he'd returned for religious reasons. Students weren't buying it. Thousands took to the streets, furious that the man they'd risked their lives to remove had just waltzed back in wearing orange robes, and that the civilian government under Prime Minister Seni Pramoj was doing absolutely nothing about it.
The right wing, meanwhile, had spent those three years building up. Military-backed paramilitary groups had been recruiting aggressively. The Village Scouts, a rural royalist militia, reportedly had three million members by 1976. The Red Gaurs were younger, more violent, and ideologically closer to fascism. A monk named Kittivudho had publicly declared that killing a communist wasn't a sin. The atmosphere was already combustible.
The Spark: A Play, a Photo, and a Lie
On 24 September 1976, two labor activists named Wichai Ketsriphongsa and Chumphon Thummai were beaten to death by police in Nakhon Pathom, a city just west of Bangkok. Their crime was putting up anti-Thanom posters. Their bodies were hung from a gate. The location became known as the "Red Gate."
Students at Thammasat University staged a dramatisation of the hanging on 4 October to protest the killings. A photograph of the performance appeared in a right-wing newspaper called Dao Siam the following day. The paper's front page claimed that one of the student performers, made up to portray a hanging victim, bore a resemblance to Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn (today's King of Thailand).
It was, at best, a stretch. The photograph had reportedly been doctored. But it didn't matter. Army-controlled radio stations broadcast the accusation across more than 260 frequencies, calling the students communist insurgents committing lese-majeste, the Thai crime of insulting the monarchy. The students tried to correct the record. Nobody was listening.
The call went out over the airwaves: come to Thammasat. Right-wing forces began massing around the university. Around 15,000 extremists gathered near the campus. Even the military's Housewives Association mobilised.
October 6: The Attack
By the evening of 5 October, roughly 2,000 to 4,000 students were inside the Thammasat University campus on the banks of the Chao Phraya river. They were holding a sit-in, and they knew things were turning dangerous. Police had surrounded the perimeter.
The attack began in the early hours of 6 October. Police opened fire on the campus using assault rifles, machine guns, pistols, grenades, recoilless rifles, and anti-tank guns. Right-wing paramilitaries stormed the gates. Students who tried to escape by jumping into the Chao Phraya river were shot at by the navy.
The violence that followed was not just lethal. It was theatrical in its cruelty. Students were lynched from trees on the adjacent Sanam Luang, the open field next to the campus. The most enduring image from that morning, captured by Associated Press photographer Neal Ulevich, shows a hanged student's body being beaten with a folded metal chair by a man who appears to be smiling. Faces in the crowd around him are grinning. The photograph won Ulevich the Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Photography in 1977.
Those who surrendered weren't necessarily spared. Reports documented survivors being robbed, sexually assaulted, and beaten after giving themselves up. Some were killed anyway.
The official figures, released by the military junta that seized power that same day, listed 46 dead, 167 injured, and 3,059 arrested. Puey Ungphakorn, the former rector of Thammasat who was in exile at the time, estimated the death toll at over 100. The Ruam Katanyu Foundation, the organisation that handled the bodies, put the figure at over 500. The truth has never been fully established, largely because no official investigation has ever taken place.
The Coup and the Silence
Within hours of the massacre, Admiral Sangad Chaloryu led a military coup and dissolved the civilian government. It was the eighth coup in Thailand since 1932. The new junta appointed Thanin Kraivichien, a hardline royalist judge, as prime minister.
The incoming government's position on what had just happened was simple: forgive and forget. An amnesty law was passed that extended protection to those responsible for the violence. No one was charged. No one was prosecuted. One of the politicians who had publicly encouraged the crackdown, Samak Sundaravej, was rewarded with a position as Minister of Interior in the new government. He later became Prime Minister of Thailand in 2008.
Discussion of the massacre was effectively suppressed. It wasn't taught in schools. It didn't appear in official histories. In a country with strict lese-majeste laws and a history of silencing political dissent, October 6 became what one scholar called "organised forgetting."
The parallels with other instances of state violence against protesters are hard to ignore. Events like the 1955 murder of Emmett Till in the United States, or the lynchings of J. Thomas Shipp and Abraham Smith, also went unpunished for decades and were similarly erased from mainstream memory.
The Students Who Went to the Jungle
For many survivors, fleeing was the only option. More than 3,000 students left Bangkok after the massacre and headed into the jungle to join the Communist Party of Thailand, who were fighting a guerrilla insurgency against the military government. The memorial plaque at Thammasat University records this fact.
Among those who went underground were people who would later become prominent Thai politicians, academics, and public intellectuals. Professor Thongchai Winichakul, now one of the most respected historians of Thai nationalism and a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was a student leader on campus that day. He has said there wasn't a single day in the 40 years since that he didn't think about it.
Others remained in hiding for years. Jaran Ditapichai, one of the arrested students, escaped from custody after a guard forgot to lock his cell and eventually fled to France, where he still lived in exile decades later, facing a charge of insulting the Thai royal family.
The willingness of ordinary young people to risk everything in opposition to authoritarianism is a thread that runs through modern history. Sophie Scholl, executed by the Nazis at 21 for distributing anti-war leaflets, is one of the more well-known examples from the European context. The students of Thammasat belong in the same conversation.
Why It's Still Relevant
In 1977, the guerrilla insurgency that many survivors had joined began to collapse after China ended its support for the Communist Party of Thailand. A subsequent amnesty allowed many of the students to return from the jungle and reintegrate into Thai society. Some became the establishment they'd once fought against. Some remained dissenters.
The massacre stayed buried in public consciousness for years. It wasn't until the 1990s that open commemoration became more possible. Annual memorial events now take place at Thammasat on 6 October, attended by monks, activists, and survivors. A monument on the campus marks the spot.
The photograph Neal Ulevich took of the hanged student being beaten with a chair has become one of those images that circulates far beyond its original context. Fans of the Dead Kennedys punk band will have seen it; the image appeared on one of their album inserts. It's recognised globally. The event it documents remains largely unknown outside Thailand.
Thailand's treatment of this history fits a pattern recognisable from other countries. The difficulty of confronting state violence is not unique to Thailand. Ginggaew Lorsoungnern, a Thai woman who survived her own scheduled execution, speaks to another dimension of Thailand's complicated relationship with state power and justice.
Nobody has ever been held accountable for what happened on 6 October 1976. The perpetrators, both those in uniform and those who showed up as civilians with weapons, have never faced justice. A survivor named Wichian Visutanakon put it plainly at a memorial event in 2020: "The worst thing is those people who did those crimes are still proud and don't regret their actions."
Forty-nine years on, that remains true.
