Search this site

Frank Sheeran’s life reads like a crime thriller—except the violence, betrayals, and backroom dealings weren’t fiction. Known as The Irishman , Sheeran was a labour union official with close ties to the Bufalino crime family, a trusted enforcer for Teamsters president Jimmy Hoffa, and a man accused of knowing far too much about the criminal underworld. His story, told in Charles Brandt’s book I Heard You Paint Houses , formed the basis for Martin Scorsese’s The Irishman  (2019), starring Robert De Niro as Sheeran, Al Pacino as Hoffa, and Joe Pesci as Bufalino. Yet, much of what Sheeran claimed—especially his alleged role in the disappearance of Hoffa—has been debated by historians, law enforcement, and fellow mobsters. Was he truly the man who pulled the trigger, or was he simply an old man embellishing his past? Let’s look at the facts behind the legend. Early Life: A Fighter from the Start Frank Sheeran was born in Darby, Pennsylvania, in 1920. The small, working-class town on the outskirts of Philadelphia shaped him into a tough, hardened individual. His father, Thomas Sheeran Jr., was of Irish descent, and his mother, Mary Agnes Hanson, was Swedish. From an early age, Frank was forced to fight—literally. His father would make him spar with boxing gloves, toughening him up in a way that suggested an early introduction to brutality. With limited prospects, Sheeran enlisted in the U.S. Army in 1941, just before the United States entered World War II. World War II: A Training Ground for Violence Sheeran’s military service is central to his later life, as he often claimed that it was during the war that he learned to kill without hesitation. He served in the 45th Infantry Division—nicknamed The Thunderbirds  and sometimes The Killer Division . His 411 days of combat far exceeded the average soldier’s 100 days. He fought in some of the most brutal campaigns of the war, including the invasions of Sicily, Salerno, and Anzio. He later participated in the invasion of southern France and fought through Germany. Sheeran openly admitted to committing war crimes, recalling how he and his fellow soldiers summarily executed German prisoners. In his mind, these experiences desensitised him to murder, making his later work with the mob feel routine. One anecdote he shared involved ordering German POWs to dig their own graves before shooting them—a dark foreshadowing of the work he would later do for the Mafia. The Road to Organised Crime: Teamsters and the Mob After being discharged from the army in 1945, Sheeran drifted through life, working as a truck driver and a labourer. His real break came in 1955 when he met Russell Bufalino, the quiet but immensely powerful head of the Bufalino crime family. Bufalino took Sheeran under his wing, first using him for small errands before trusting him with more violent tasks. Bufalino eventually introduced Sheeran to Jimmy Hoffa, the charismatic and fiercely ambitious leader of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Hoffa, who was under constant pressure from the Mafia and the federal government, needed muscle—someone who could enforce discipline and eliminate threats. Sheeran quickly became one of Hoffa’s most trusted enforcers. Hoffa’s first words to Sheeran were supposedly: “I heard you paint houses.” The phrase was mob slang for contract killing—the “paint” being the blood that splattered on the walls. Sheeran responded: “And I do my own carpentry.” This meant he not only killed but also disposed of bodies. Sheeran became deeply involved in Teamster politics, eventually rising to become the president of Local 326 in Wilmington, Delaware. But as the 1960s and 70s progressed, Hoffa’s conflicts with the Mafia escalated. His determination to regain control of the Teamsters after his prison sentence put him at odds with powerful figures like Bufalino and the New York Mafia families. This would prove fatal. The Disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa On 30 July 1975, Jimmy Hoffa vanished from the parking lot of the Machus Red Fox restaurant in Metro Detroit. He had reportedly been lured there under the false impression that he would be meeting with Bufalino’s men to discuss his return to power. Decades later, Sheeran told Charles Brandt that he had been ordered to kill Hoffa. According to his account, Sheeran, Hoffa, and Salvatore Briguglio (another mob enforcer) drove to a nearby house. Once inside, Sheeran shot Hoffa twice in the back of the head. He claimed that Hoffa’s body was later cremated. However, not everyone believes Sheeran’s story. Critics point out that Hoffa’s murder was almost certainly a Mafia-ordered hit, and there’s little evidence that Sheeran was involved. The FBI did find bloodstains in the house where Sheeran said Hoffa was killed, but the DNA did not match Hoffa’s. Still, no other compelling theory has emerged, and Hoffa’s body has never been found. The Murder of Joe Gallo Another controversial claim from Sheeran’s I Heard You Paint Houses  confession was that he killed Crazy Joe  Gallo, the flamboyant New York gangster gunned down at Umberto’s Clam House in Little Italy in 1972. According to Sheeran, Bufalino ordered the hit after Gallo became too unpredictable. Sheeran claimed he personally walked into the restaurant and shot Gallo in front of his family. However, most Mafia historians believe Gallo was killed by a member of the Colombo crime family, not Sheeran. Witnesses from the time describe multiple shooters, and Sheeran was never a suspect until he made the claim himself decades later. Prison and Final Years Sheeran’s criminal career caught up with him in 1980 when he was convicted of labour racketeering and sentenced to 32 years in prison. He served 13 years before being released due to poor health. He spent his final years in a nursing home, battling cancer and giving his final interviews to Charles Brandt. In these last days, he seemed to seek redemption, confessing to crimes he had never been charged with. Whether he was being truthful or simply embellishing remains a matter of debate. Sheeran died on 14 December 2003, at the age of 83. He was buried at Holy Cross Cemetery in Yeadon, Pennsylvania. The Irishman: Fact or Fiction? Frank Sheeran’s life has been mythologised, particularly after I Heard You Paint Houses  and The Irishman . Some of his confessions have been widely disputed, while others seem credible. What is clear is that Sheeran was deeply involved with the Mafia, participated in violent crimes, and had close ties to Hoffa and Bufalino. But was he Hoffa’s killer? The truth may never be known. Regardless, his story remains one of the most fascinating in the history of American organised crime—a tale of loyalty, betrayal, and the brutal realities of the underworld.

In the heart of Victorian London, amidst a society obsessed with propriety, decorum, and rigid social structures, an unusual profession emerged—one that was simultaneously artistic, controversial, and utterly fascinating. Sutherland Macdonald, Britain’s first professional tattoo artist, carved out a unique place for himself in history, pioneering an industry that would go on to become a global phenomenon. Tattooing in the late 19th century was not an entirely alien practice in Britain. The influence of Polynesian and Japanese tattoo traditions had begun to seep into British consciousness following Captain James Cook’s voyages to the South Pacific in the 18th century. Sailors returning from far-flung destinations bore intricate inked designs on their skin, and gradually, the art form trickled into wider society. However, it remained largely confined to seafarers, soldiers, and the working class—until Sutherland Macdonald changed everything. A Military Beginning and the Path to Tattooing Sutherland Macdonald was born on 25 June 1860 in Leeds, Yorkshire. Though little is known about his early years, it is well documented that he joined the British Army in the 1870s. He served as a telegraph operator with the Royal Engineers and saw active duty in the Anglo-Zulu War. His military service would prove to be a defining period in his life—not for the battles he witnessed, but for the exposure it gave him to the world of tattooing. Soldiers, like sailors, were among the first Europeans to adopt tattoos as a rite of passage, a mark of identity, or a means of commemorating their service. It is believed that Macdonald first encountered tattooing while stationed abroad. Already possessing an artistic flair, he became intrigued by the craft and, by the time he left the military, he had acquired the skills to embark on an entirely new career. Sutherland Macdonald: A Pioneer of the Tattoo Profession By 1889, Macdonald had established himself as a tattoo artist in London. His studio, located within the prestigious Hamam Turkish Baths at 76 Jermyn Street, was an unconventional setting for what was still considered an unconventional trade. Jermyn Street was a fashionable area, home to exclusive clubs, high-end tailors, and gentlemen’s establishments. That a tattoo artist would operate in such a refined setting was unheard of, reinforcing Macdonald’s unique position in the industry. At the time, tattooing was still a niche practice, with no formal professional structure in place. Macdonald’s prominence led to the creation of a new professional designation in 1894 when the Post Office Directory (an early equivalent of the Yellow Pages) introduced a category specifically for him: “Tattooist.” The term, a fusion of “tattoo” and “artist,” was coined to describe his occupation. Remarkably, Macdonald remained the sole individual listed under this title for four years, further demonstrating that he was in a league of his own. The Aristocracy and the Rise of Elite Tattoos One of the most remarkable aspects of Macdonald’s career was his ability to bridge the gap between tattooing and the upper echelons of British and European society. Traditionally associated with sailors, criminals, and those on the fringes of respectability, tattoos were not yet considered a mark of distinction among the wealthy and powerful. However, Macdonald’s skill and reputation attracted a clientele that included some of the most prominent figures of the era. It is said that he tattooed several of Queen Victoria’s sons, as well as the kings of Norway and Denmark. The British royal family, particularly King Edward VII (then the Prince of Wales), played a crucial role in the changing perception of tattoos. Edward had been tattooed during a visit to Jerusalem in 1862, a decision that lent an air of prestige to the practice. His son, the future King George V, followed suit, receiving a Japanese dragon tattoo while visiting Japan. These royal endorsements helped to normalise tattooing among the aristocracy, making it not just acceptable, but fashionable. Macdonald’s reputation as a gentlemanly and refined artist also contributed to the growing acceptance of tattoos. In his 1953 memoir, Memoirs of a Tattooist , fellow tattoo artist George Burchett described Macdonald as “a well-spoken, intelligent and gentle man,” noting that he was treated as an equal by his elite clientele. His studio in Jermyn Street became a place where the upper classes could indulge in the once-taboo practice without fear of social condemnation. Innovation and Artistic Excellence Beyond his influence on the social perception of tattoos, Macdonald was also a technical innovator. Like many early tattoo artists, he initially worked with hand tools, a laborious and time-consuming process. However, in 1894, he patented an electric tattooing machine, streamlining the process and allowing for greater precision. His invention predated many similar devices that would later dominate the industry, underscoring his role as a pioneer. Macdonald is also credited with pioneering the use of colour in tattooing, particularly the introduction of blue and green inks. Until this point, most tattoos were monochrome, created using simple black or dark pigments. The addition of new colours expanded the artistic possibilities of tattooing, allowing for more intricate and visually striking designs. He was renowned for the high quality of his work, which was described as exceptionally detailed and finely executed. Unlike some of his contemporaries, who focused on bold, heavily outlined designs, Macdonald’s tattoos were often more delicate and ornate, reflecting his artistic training and refined aesthetic sensibilities. The Decline of an Era For nearly four decades, Macdonald operated at the forefront of British tattooing, but as the early 20th century progressed, the landscape began to shift. While tattoos remained popular among certain social circles, the Victorian and Edwardian fascination with the practice gradually waned. By the time Macdonald retired, other notable tattooists, such as George Burchett, had begun to rise in prominence. The profession had expanded considerably, but Macdonald’s name remained synonymous with its early days of refinement and artistry. His work had helped transition tattooing from a fringe practice into a respected, if still controversial, art form. Macdonald’s Enduring Legacy Despite his pioneering role in the tattoo industry, Sutherland Macdonald’s name was, for many years, somewhat overshadowed by later artists. However, in recent years, renewed interest in the history of tattooing has brought him back into the spotlight. In 2016, the Museum of London included some of Macdonald’s work in its Tattoo London  exhibition, highlighting his contributions to the art form. Today, as tattooing enjoys widespread mainstream acceptance, his legacy is more relevant than ever. His innovations in technique, his role in changing societal attitudes, and his reputation as an artist of exceptional skill all mark him as a true pioneer of the craft. For a man who was the first to be recognised as a professional tattooist in Britain, Macdonald’s influence extends far beyond his own era. His work helped shape modern tattoo culture, and his name deserves to be remembered alongside the greatest artists of his time. Sutherland Macdonald’s journey from a soldier to a tattooist in Victorian London is a story of talent, innovation, and perseverance. At a time when tattooing was neither accepted nor understood, he forged a path that transformed the practice from an underground tradition into a respected profession. By bridging the gap between tattooing and high society, pioneering the use of electric tattoo machines, and introducing colour into tattooing, he left an indelible mark on the history of body art. Today, as tattoos are more popular than ever, the legacy of Sutherland Macdonald serves as a reminder of the rich history and artistic mastery that underpins modern tattoo culture.

Tibetan Buddhism has a rich artistic tradition, with intricate thangka paintings and elaborate sculptures forming an essential part of its visual culture. But behind these stunning images of Buddhas, bodhisattvas, and deities lies a system of strict geometric proportions designed to ensure their spiritual accuracy. At the heart of this system is the Tibetan Book of Proportions, a lesser-known but vital manuscript that serves as a guide for artists creating religious images. This book isn't about arbitrary artistic preferences—it’s a blueprint for sacred geometry, ensuring that divine figures are depicted in ways that align with Tibetan Buddhist cosmology and teachings. Every measurement, every line, and every gesture is imbued with meaning, designed to aid meditation and bring practitioners closer to enlightenment. What is the Tibetan Book of Proportions? The Tibetan Book of Proportions (sometimes referred to in Tibetan as thig tshad  or thig rtsis ) is essentially an instruction manual for artists working within the Tibetan Buddhist tradition. It lays out precise guidelines for the dimensions and spatial relationships of figures in paintings and sculptures. Think of it as a kind of sacred mathematical guide—a way of ensuring that every Buddha, deity, and spiritual figure adheres to an idealised form. Just as the Renaissance masters in the West followed systems of proportion such as the golden ratio to create harmony in their work, Tibetan artists used their own proportional systems to maintain the balance and integrity of sacred images. The book typically includes: Grids and diagrams outlining the correct proportions of Buddhas, bodhisattvas, and wrathful deities. Measurements based on the figure’s finger width or face width, ensuring consistency in size and structure. Instructions for the correct postures, mudras (hand gestures), and facial expressions of different figures. Guidelines for symbolic objects, such as lotus thrones, halos, and offering bowls. These rules weren't intended to stifle artistic creativity but rather to ensure that each image functioned as a precise spiritual tool. The Purpose of Sacred Proportions Why did Tibetan Buddhist art need such strict proportional guidelines? The answer lies in the role these images play in religious practice. Unlike secular art, which is often created for aesthetic enjoyment or self-expression, Tibetan sacred images serve a functional purpose—they act as visual aids for meditation and devotion. In Tibetan Buddhist belief, an inaccurately drawn Buddha or deity could disrupt the intended spiritual energy of the image. If the proportions were incorrect, it might not properly convey the qualities associated with that deity. For instance: A Buddha with distorted proportions might not radiate the necessary serenity and balance. A wrathful protector deity drawn without the proper symmetry might lose its intended spiritual power. If a bodhisattva’s hands, eyes, or seated posture were not drawn according to tradition, their symbolic meanings could be lost or misunderstood. The Tibetan Book of Proportions ensures that each figure is depicted in a way that aligns with Buddhist teachings and traditions, reinforcing their meditative and ritual function. How the System Works The proportional system typically starts with a basic unit of measurement, often the width of the deity’s finger or the width of their face. From there, the rest of the figure is mapped out with careful attention to balance and symmetry. For example, in many depictions: The total height of the figure might be seven to ten times the face width. The shoulders are placed at a specific ratio to the head, ensuring an ideal posture. The hands and arms must follow exact lengths and angles, corresponding with traditional Buddhist texts. Some figures require even more complexity. Multi-armed or multi-headed deities, for instance, have additional sets of rules governing their proportions to maintain a harmonious and symmetrical composition. Interestingly, variations exist depending on the specific deity or regional tradition. Some schools of Tibetan Buddhism, such as the Gelug, Kagyu, and Nyingma, may have slightly different proportional guidelines, but they all follow the fundamental principles outlined in the Tibetan Book of Proportions. The Influence of Indian and Chinese Art While the Tibetan Book of Proportions is deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhism, its origins are linked to Indian and Chinese artistic traditions. Tibetan Buddhist art evolved from the styles found in early Indian Buddhist manuscripts, particularly from the Pala Empire (8th–12th century). Many of the proportional guidelines in the Tibetan tradition have clear connections to Indian iconometry, a system used in Hindu and Buddhist sculpture. Meanwhile, Tibetan art also absorbed influences from Chinese landscape painting and decorative motifs, which contributed to the vibrant backgrounds and intricate cloud patterns seen in many thangkas. Despite these external influences, the Tibetans refined and codified their own proportional system, making it a uniquely Tibetan contribution to Buddhist art. The Role of Artists and Training In traditional Tibetan Buddhist monasteries, artists did not simply pick up a brush and start painting—they trained for years under strict guidance. Aspiring artists, known as lhakars , would study under master painters or sculptors, learning the proportions and techniques before they were allowed to create their own works. Many artists memorised the proportions and could recreate figures freehand, but most still relied on grid systems, ensuring precision. The Book of Proportions served as both a reference guide and a teaching tool, reinforcing the deep spiritual connection between artist and artwork. Tibetan Buddhist art was never about artistic individuality in the Western sense. Instead, the goal was to channel divine energy through the correct use of form and colour, allowing the finished image to function as a gateway to the spiritual realm. Modern Influence Despite centuries of political upheaval and the decline of traditional artistic workshops, the Tibetan Book of Proportions is still used today. Many Tibetan artists, both inside Tibet and in exile communities in Nepal and India, continue to follow these guidelines. In the modern era, there has been renewed interest in Tibetan Buddhist art, with scholars, practitioners, and even contemporary artists studying these ancient principles. Digital tools and 3D modelling now allow artists to create proportionally accurate Buddhas and mandalas, keeping the tradition alive in new forms. Even in contemporary spiritual art, the philosophy behind the Tibetan Book of Proportions remains relevant: harmony, balance, and spiritual intention should guide the creation of sacred images. The Tibetan Book of Proportions isn’t just an obscure manuscript—it’s a testament to the deep connection between art and spirituality in Tibetan Buddhism. It reveals how Tibetan artists weren’t merely painters or sculptors but spiritual engineers, constructing images with mathematical precision to bridge the material and spiritual worlds. While the book itself may not be widely known outside of Buddhist artistic circles, its influence is evident in every traditional thangka painting and monastery wall carving. It serves as a reminder that, in Tibetan Buddhism, art is more than decoration—it’s a path to enlightenment, drawn with the utmost care and devotion.

They say fortune favours the bold, but sometimes it also favours those willing to crawl through sewage. Albert Spaggiari certainly thought so. A small-time crook turned criminal mastermind, he orchestrated the most audacious bank heist in French history—breaking into a supposedly impenetrable vault, making off with millions, and vanishing without a trace. Spaggiari’s life was anything but ordinary. Born in 1932, he was a rebellious child who couldn’t keep out of trouble. His father died when he was just three, and his mother, who ran a lingerie shop, remarried. But Albert despised his stepfather and left home at 17, joining the Parachute Regiment just as France was embroiled in the conflict against Ho Chi Minh’s communist forces in Indochina. He proved himself a tough soldier, even earning decorations for bravery, but his old habits resurfaced. In 1953, he was caught breaking into a milk bar in Hanoi, attempting to steal the takings. That stunt got him shipped back to France in chains, where he served time in prison. By the late 1960s, it seemed like Spaggiari had put his wild past behind him. He married a nurse, moved to the sunny south of France, and opened a photography shop in Nice. He quickly gained a reputation as a charming and talented wedding photographer, snapping society events and rubbing shoulders with the wealthy. But the quiet life didn’t suit him. The itch for adventure never left, and when he learned that the sewers beneath Nice ran close to the vaults of the Société Générale bank, a daring plan started to take shape. Worried customers queue outside the Société Générale bank in Nice after the raid in July 1976. Ever meticulous, Spaggiari first rented a safety deposit box inside the bank to test security. He placed an alarm clock inside, set to go off at midnight. If there were any seismic or acoustic sensors in the vault, the ringing clock would trigger them. Nothing happened. The bank, like the owners of the Titanic, believed their defences were unbreakable. Now confident, Spaggiari recruited a team of criminals from Marseille. For two months in the summer of 1976, they waded through filth in the sewers, digging an eight-metre (26-foot) tunnel reinforced as carefully as a mine shaft. They even strung up electric cables for lighting. To keep morale up, they decorated the tunnel walls with racy pictures of women—because, why not? Police would later find the remains of meals, empty wine bottles, and cigarette packs scattered along the passageway. The gang made their move on the Bastille Day weekend, knowing the city would be in the throes of celebration. Late on Friday night, they broke through into the bank’s vault. Their first move? Sealing the heavy vault door shut from the inside with a welding gun. Now, they had all the time in the world. Police watch as an acetylene tank is pulled from the sewers of Nice days after the bank was robbed by a gang Over the next two days, they methodically cracked open 371 safety deposit boxes, sifting through their contents. If some accounts are to be believed, Spaggiari even brought a meal—complete with wine and pâté—and the gang took a break to enjoy a picnic in the vault. The bank had no inventory of what was inside the deposit boxes, meaning the true value of the haul would never be known. Estimates ranged from 30 million to 100 million francs in cash and jewels. When the bank finally forced open the vault door on Monday morning, they found it ransacked, littered with discarded boxes, wine bottles, and leftovers from the thieves’ feast. On the wall, scrawled in large letters, was Spaggiari’s parting message: “Sans armes, ni violence, ni haine”  (Without weapons, violence, or hate). For weeks, the police had no leads. But eventually, a tip-off led to the arrest of one of the thieves, who spilled the beans and named the entire gang—including Spaggiari. At the time, he was in the Far East, travelling as a photographer with the Mayor of Nice. The moment his plane touched down back in France, he was arrested. At his trial, Spaggiari pulled off his greatest escape. He requested a private meeting with the judge in chambers, supposedly to discuss information. Instead, he suddenly bolted for the window, flung it open, and leapt out. As he landed, he turned back with a grin, shouted “Au revoir!” , and disappeared on the back of an accomplice’s waiting motorbike. Spaggiari heading into court French police never caught him. In his absence, he was sentenced to life in prison, but he spent the rest of his days drifting between South America and Europe, rumoured to have occasionally snuck back into France to see his wife. By the late 1980s, he was living under an alias in Italy, where he eventually died of lung cancer in 1989. His legend lived on. In 2008, a French film titled Sans armes, ni haine, ni violence  was released, portraying Spaggiari as a mix of a romantic rogue and a delusional fantasist, marooned by a hotel pool in Argentina. Spaggiari himself wrote about the heist in his 1977 book, Sewers of Gold , while French journalists René-Louis Maurice and Jean-Claude Simoën documented the case in The Heist of the Century , later adapted by thriller author Ken Follett. The stolen millions? They were never recovered

On the evening of August 28th, 1922, Ethel Geller Yeldem was about to step onto a streetcar at the southwest entrance of the Ohio State Fairgrounds when something on the curb caught her eye—a small, rectangular case. Curious, she picked it up and, once settled into her seat, opened it to reveal an expensive-looking pair of eyeglasses. Wanting to do the right thing, she set out to find the owner, answering lost-and-found notices and even posting one of her own. But as weeks passed with no claimant, she reasoned that the glasses must have belonged to a fairgoer who had long since left town. With no further leads, she tucked them away in a drawer and forgot about them. Love and Family Fittingly, just as she had tried to return the spectacles to their owner, love and companionship eventually found their way back to her. A year after her first husband’s sudden death from a heart attack, Ethel met Darby Yeldem, a striking labourer who claimed to be Native American. Their relationship was passionate, to say the least—so much so that by the time they were married, Ethel was already expecting. In the years that followed, she was in a near-constant state of pregnancy, bringing seven children into their modest west side home. With four more children from her previous marriage, life in the Yeldem household was nothing short of chaotic. A Family in Crisis But in 1925, the cracks in their marriage deepened into something much darker. Ethel discovered that Darby had been molesting her eldest daughter, Mildred. During his trial, another shocking truth came to light—Darby wasn’t Native American at all but African American, and his real surname wasn’t Yeldem but Medley. He had reversed the spelling of his name and lied about his background to conceal a criminal past. That same year, while the family was still reeling from the betrayal, tragedy struck again. Ethel’s ten-month-old son, Walter, died of cholera infantum. A String of Hardships The following year offered no respite. In July 1926, eight-year-old Elaine was struck by a car while chasing a ball into the street. She survived, but with a fractured skull and broken ribs. Then, in December, Darby was finally sentenced to ten years in the Ohio Penitentiary for his crimes against Mildred. While his imprisonment may have brought some relief, it also left Ethel struggling to provide for her children. She took in laundry and sold newspapers on the corner of State and High Streets, doing whatever she could to make ends meet. Through it all, Mildred persevered—despite the horror she had endured, she excelled in both academics and athletics, eventually securing a job at Mount Carmel Hospital as a student nurse to help support the family. Ethel Yeldem's Breaking Point Spring had never been kind to Ethel. In April 1918, her first husband, Otto, had died suddenly at work. The following March, she had married Darby. In April 1925, her world had shattered when he raped her thirteen-year-old daughter. And in May 1928, her son Vernon, just ten years old, had walked all the way to Dayton to escape the hardship of home, only to be returned by the police. By May 1930, Ethel had reached her breaking point. On the morning of the 6th, she confided in a neighbour that they might soon have to make a trip to Green Lawn Cemetery because she was ready to give up. The neighbour brushed it off, telling her to "brace up." Later that day, Ethel did something unusual—she bought each of her children new clothes, a luxury they could scarcely afford. Instead of going to school, they took a taxi to Baker Art Studio, where they posed for a family portrait. After returning home, they enjoyed an uncharacteristically extravagant meal. Then, one by one, Ethel sent her children upstairs to prepare for bed. A Mother's Final Act As each child climbed the stairs, Ethel bathed them, dressed them in their nightgowns, and lovingly combed their hair. Then, she picked up a rifle wrapped in a towel and shot each one through the heart. One by one, she laid their bodies on mattresses in the front bedroom. But ten-year-old Elaine realised what was happening. She managed to escape through a window onto the back porch roof. A group of boys playing baseball next door saw her, half-dressed, screaming, "Murder! Murder! Mother is killing all of us!" They watched as an arm reached out from the window, grabbed Elaine, and dragged her back inside. Assuming she was just getting a beating, they resumed their game. That evening, Mildred returned from work and heard crying upstairs. When she asked if everything was alright, Ethel replied that she had punished one of the younger children. Then she sent Mildred to the store to buy stamps. No sooner had Mildred left than Ervan, one of Ethel’s older sons, returned from the theatre. As he stepped inside, he heard faint moans from upstairs and ran to see what was wrong. What he found was beyond comprehension. Ethel lay in bed, her shirt soaked in blood from a gunshot wound to the chest. Nearby, his sister Elaine was dead. He rushed to the front bedroom, where he discovered six of his siblings, their bodies neatly arranged. Overcome with horror, he barely managed to cry out for help. Down on the street, Mildred stood frozen, the book of stamps slipping from her fingers as the realisation dawned. The Aftermath Authorities arrived to a scene of unimaginable devastation. Ethel had left behind a note for her surviving children: "Mildred, Ervan and Vernon: Don’t think too hard of mother for this please. Just always try to do what is right. Listen to older advice. It will always be for your good what is told you. I am so tired I can’t go on and no one to take care of the rest is why I take them with me. I want you to go to church, do as you are told and try to live this down. Goodbye, Mother." But Ethel didn’t die. The bullet had missed her heart, and doctors believed she would recover. She refused to speak, barely whispering pleas to be left alone. On May 8th, as her seven children were laid to rest in a mass grave at Union Cemetery, she thrashed in anguish. The two youngest, Alan and Alice, were buried together in a single casket. On May 16th, despite her prognosis, Ethel suddenly complained of chest pains. Moments later, she died of internal haemorrhaging. She was buried beside her children. Plans for a headstone never materialised, and today, the site is little more than an unmarked patch of grass. Later, it emerged that Ethel had written to Darby in prison, telling him of her plans to kill their children. The penitentiary’s mail vetting process delayed the letter, and by the time it arrived, it was far too late. In 2012, the house where the tragedy took place was demolished as part of the city’s Vacant and Abandoned Property Initiative. Today, only the concrete steps remain—a silent, unsettling reminder of a mother’s desperation in the face of relentless hardship.

When you think of Allied espionage, you probably picture daring spies with hidden explosives, sneaky wiretaps, or maybe even weaponised bats. But declassified documents reveal that World War II was also won by a different kind of secret agent—bumbling factory workers who "accidentally" messed things up, train conductors who took inefficiency to an art form, and middle managers so spectacularly bad at their jobs that they were basically weapons-grade useless. All of them were trained, believe it or not, by the Simple Sabotage Field Manual . William J. “Wild Bill” Donovan, first head of the OSS and supervisor of the Simple Sabotage Manual. By 1944, World War II was winding down, but the Allies still needed a little extra oomph —more troops, more local cooperation, and ideally, more ways to drive Axis governments up the wall. Enter the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the grandparent of the CIA and, apparently, the original prank war masterminds. They had a vision: what if the best way to mess with an enemy government wasn’t through brute force, but through good, old-fashioned workplace incompetence ? Thus was born the Simple Sabotage Field Manual —essentially the world’s first officially sanctioned “how to be annoying at work” guide. The OSS figured they could train an army of disgruntled European citizens to wage war by doing their jobs very badly.  Think of it as an anti-productivity seminar for the resistance. This ultimate un-training manual was packed with creative ways for everyday people to make life difficult for their occupiers. It was distributed through leaflets, radio broadcasts, and in-person meetings with carefully chosen potential saboteurs—basically, the folks who were already championing inefficiency in their workplaces. “There are ‘innumerable simple acts which the ordinary individual citizen-saboteur can perform,’” the manual cheerfully reassured its readers. And the best part? You didn’t need high-tech gadgets or military gear—just “salt, nails, candles, pebbles, thread, or any other materials he might normally be expected to possess.” In other words, with a little creativity, your junk drawer could be an arsenal. The possibilities were endless. You could jam a lock with a hairpin, casually drop a wrench into a fuse box, or sabotage machinery by sanding down surfaces that were supposed to be smooth. But why stop there? The manual encouraged would-be saboteurs to dream big! Sure, you could  slash the tires of an army truck on your way to work—but why not really  go for it and throw a bunch of hair into the rubber-mixing vat, ruining the material for an entire fleet? It was the 1940s version of “think outside the box,” except instead of “synergizing business solutions,” you were creating industrial chaos with the contents of a barbershop floor. To a reader entrenched in modern-day bureaucracies, this sounds a little like how things go even when no trickery is planned. “Some of the instructions… remain surprisingly relevant” as “a reminder of how easily productivity and order can be undermined”. A few businessfolk recently wrote an advice book based on the Simple Sabotage manual , meant to help frustrated higher-ups “detect and reduce the impact” of saboteur tactics. But what if you lacked access to important machinery to ruin? No problem! The manual also laid out a second, subtler type of sabotage—one that required no tools, no physical damage, and only an enthusiastic commitment to being a human roadblock. This method was based on “universal opportunities to make faulty decisions, to adopt a non-cooperative attitude, and to induce others to follow suit.” (A description which, let’s be honest, sounds suspiciously like the mission statement of most corporate middle management.) The OSS gave specific examples of this technique, grandly dubbed “the human element.” Citizens were encouraged to “cry and sob hysterically at every occasion, especially when confronted by government clerks.” Train conductors could “issue two tickets for the same seat in the train, so that an interesting argument will result.” (Nothing derails efficiency like an impromptu shouting match.) And for the pièce de résistance? A truly avant-garde sabotage method: ruining propaganda films with moths. Yes, moths. “Take the bag to the movies with you,” the manual instructed. “The moths will fly out and climb into the projector beam, so that the film will be obscured by fluttering shadows.” And just like that, one brave moth-wielding operative could transform a serious government propaganda piece into an accidental Hitchcock horror flick. But the real heroes of this sabotage campaign? Middle managers.  The manual dedicated an entire section, “General Interference with Organizations and Production,” to explaining how white-collar professionals could use their bureaucratic talents for maximum disruption. Step one: make every decision painful . “Bring up irrelevant issues as frequently as possible,” the OSS advised. Always hold meetings. Preferably, long, pointless meetings. “Haggle over precise wordings… Hold conferences when there is more critical work to be done.” Other surefire ways to tank productivity included promoting terrible employees while criticizing competent ones. Any of this sound familiar? That’s because, as some modern readers have noted, “some of the instructions… remain surprisingly relevant.” So much so that some business experts even repackaged the Simple Sabotage manual as a corporate advice book—this time to help managers identify  workplace saboteurs rather than train  them. (Irony is alive and well.) Of course, back in 1944, the OSS had to address one small issue: most people don’t naturally have the instinct to be this  incompetent. “Purposeful stupidity is contrary to human nature,” the manual explains in the section “Motivating the Saboteur.” No worries—just a little coaching and peer pressure should do the trick! A recruit “frequently needs… information and suggestions,” not to mention encouragement and the knowledge that he is not alone. He can rest assured that somewhere, at that very moment, there are others just like him—sanding things that don’t need sanding, scheduling meetings that don’t need to happen, and, of course, carrying bags of moths into the cinema. The whole manual is available for your perusal in this declassified PDF Pages 8 to 11 have good instructions for setting almost anything on fire. Page 19 teaches you how to derail mine cars. And remember, if you are caught, “always be profuse in your apologies.” Happy trails, saboteurs.

In 1965, the small town of Selma, Alabama, became the epicentre of a movement that would shake the foundations of American democracy. The Selma to Montgomery marches—three historic protest marches spanning 54 miles—were a direct challenge to racial injustice and a powerful call for voting rights. Organised by nonviolent activists, these marches exposed the brutality of segregation and played a crucial role in the passage of the landmark Voting Rights Act later that year. Klansmen march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1940 The Struggle for the Right to Vote For decades, African Americans in the South faced relentless barriers to voting. Jim Crow laws, introduced in the late 19th century, ensured that Black citizens were systematically disenfranchised. Literacy tests, poll taxes, and intimidation tactics kept millions from the ballot box. Selma, a town with a Black majority, was no exception—of the 15,000 Black residents eligible to vote in Dallas County, fewer than 130 were registered by 1961. The Dallas County Voters League (DCVL) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) took up the fight for voting rights in the early 1960s, facing arrests, violence, and harassment. When local efforts struggled to gain traction, they invited Martin Luther King Jr. and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) to amplify their cause. By early 1965, protests and marches were taking place regularly, drawing thousands into the movement. Despite the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which legally ended segregation in public spaces, Black citizens in Selma and other parts of the South still faced numerous obstacles when trying to exercise their right to vote. Local officials would routinely change rules, alter voter registration times, and use subjective literacy tests to deny Black voters their rights. Economic reprisals were also common—Black citizens who tried to register often lost their jobs, were evicted from their homes, or faced threats from white supremacist groups such as the Ku Klux Klan. The authorities’ resistance to change only strengthened the resolve of civil rights activists. Police officers, some with the Confederate flag on their helmets, block the march in Selma. Jimmie Lee Jackson’s Death Ignites Action As tensions escalated, tragedy struck. On 18 February 1965, a peaceful protest in nearby Marion, Alabama, turned violent when state troopers attacked demonstrators. In the chaos, Jimmie Lee Jackson, a 26-year-old activist, was shot by state trooper James Bonard Fowler. Jackson had been trying to protect his mother and grandfather from being beaten. He died eight days later from his wounds, fuelling outrage and determination within the movement. His death became a rallying cry for action, and activists, led by James Bevel of the SCLC, planned a march from Selma to Montgomery to demand voting rights and justice for Jackson. Jimmie Lee Jackson Bloody Sunday: A Nation Watches On 7 March 1965, about 600 marchers set out from Selma, determined to walk to Montgomery and demand their rights. Led by John Lewis of SNCC and Hosea Williams of the SCLC, they crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge, only to be met by a wall of state troopers and local deputies. What followed was a brutal assault—tear gas filled the air, clubs rained down on protesters, and mounted officers charged into the crowd. Many marchers were beaten unconscious, including Amelia Boynton, whose image lying on the ground became one of the most powerful symbols of the civil rights movement. John Lewis suffered a fractured skull, and dozens were hospitalised. Televised images of the brutal attack shocked Americans and galvanised support for the civil rights movement. Viewers across the country saw the shocking violence inflicted upon peaceful demonstrators, prompting widespread outrage. The event, which came to be known as Bloody Sunday, marked a turning point in the fight for voting rights. Martin Luther King Jr. and activists pray after being stopped by a police roadblock. Turnaround Tuesday and Tragedy Two days later, on 9 March, King led a second march to the bridge but turned back in a tactical decision to avoid further bloodshed. That night, a white Unitarian minister, James Reeb, was attacked by segregationists and died from his injuries. His murder, much like Jackson’s, underscored the deadly resistance civil rights activists faced. As public pressure mounted, federal courts weighed in. Judge Frank Minis Johnson ruled that the demonstrators had a constitutional right to march, paving the way for a third and final march. Police officers use excessive force to crush the march in Selma. Activist John Lewis is in the light coat Alabama state troopers look on as marchers kneel in prayer after their march was halted by police. Marchers reach a police roadblock in Selma. The Final March to Montgomery On 21 March, under federal protection, thousands of marchers set off once more. This time, they were joined by supporters from across the country—religious leaders, students, and activists of all backgrounds. Over five days, they walked 10 miles a day, enduring rain, exhaustion, and threats from segregationists. By the time they reached Montgomery on 25 March, their numbers had swelled to 25,000. A civil rights marcher who was exposed to tear gas holds an unconscious Amelia Boynton Robinson after police officers attacked marchers in Selma. On the steps of the Alabama State Capitol, King delivered his iconic “How Long, Not Long” speech, declaring that justice was inevitable. “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice,” he told the crowd, offering a message of hope and resilience. Police officers force injured civil rights marchers to leave the area after their march was crushed by law enforcement personnel in Selma. The Aftermath of the Selma to Montgomery Marches and the Voting Rights Act The Selma marches had a profound impact. President Lyndon B. Johnson, deeply moved by the events, pushed for sweeping legislation. On 6 August 1965, he signed the Voting Rights Act, eliminating discriminatory practices that had long suppressed Black voters. The law brought immediate change, with voter registration drives surging across the South. Viola Liuzzo Despite this victory, the struggle continued. Activists faced ongoing resistance, and some, like Viola Liuzzo, a white mother from Detroit who came to support the marchers, were killed by the Ku Klux Klan. But the tide had turned—Selma had forced the nation to confront its injustices, and change was irreversible. A Legacy That Endures In 1960, there were a total of 53,336 black voters registered in the state of Alabama; three decades later, there were 537,285. Today, the Selma to Montgomery route is preserved as a National Historic Trail, a reminder of the courage and sacrifice of those who walked for justice. The Edmund Pettus Bridge remains a symbol of both oppression and triumph—a place where ordinary people stood up against injustice and reshaped history. An officer accosts an unconscious Amelia Boynton Robinson as mounted police officers attack civil rights marchers in Selma. James Reeb, 38, a Boston minister, is left unconscious at the Birmingham hospital after he was critically beaten by five white men following his participation in the Selma to Montgomery march, March 9, 1965. The smashed window and bloodstained door of the car in which Viola Liuzzo, a civil rights worker from Detroit, was shot to death on March 25, 1965. Liuzzo was killed just hours after she participated in the climax of the Selma to Montgomery march. Patrol officer John Krok displays the burned cross that was found in front of the home of Anthony Liuzzo, the husband of killed civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo, who was shot to death near Selma.

For centuries, the Romani people have existed on the fringes of European society, a people without a homeland, constantly moving, constantly adapting. They are storytellers, musicians, metalworkers, traders—yet to many, they are still seen through the distorted lens of stereotype. Romanticised as carefree wanderers or vilified as criminals, their real lives and histories have often been ignored. One of the few contemporary voices to offer an insider’s account of Romani life is Mikey Walsh. In his memoir, Gypsy Boy , he tells a deeply personal story of growing up in a strict Romany Gypsy community in England—a world defined by loyalty, secrecy, and deep suspicion of outsiders. But his upbringing was also shaped by violence. Walsh suffered physical and emotional abuse at the hands of his father and uncle, eventually making the painful decision to leave his community behind at just 15 years old. His book paints a bleak picture, depicting the Romani way of life as suffocating and isolated. “The Gypsy race is an old-fashioned and, sadly, a very bitter one,” he writes. “They live, breathe, sleep, grieve, love, and care for only their own people.” Why the Roma Distrust Outsiders To an outsider, this distrust of others may seem extreme. But when viewed in the context of Romani history, it makes perfect sense. The Romani people have faced persecution, violence, and systematic exclusion for centuries, often being pushed to the margins of society and treated as second-class citizens. When a culture has been met with such relentless hostility, it’s only natural to turn inward, to protect one’s own, to preserve a way of life that has endured against all odds. The Roma, often labelled “Gypsies” by outsiders, have been misunderstood from the moment they arrived in Europe. The name itself is a mistake, based on the belief that they originated from Egypt when, in reality, they came from northern India more than a thousand years ago. From the medieval period onwards, they were seen as outsiders and were often subject to harsh laws. In many parts of Europe, they were banned from settling, forced into slavery, or expelled altogether. Over time, damaging stereotypes took hold—Roma were branded as thieves, fortune tellers, and tricksters, an image reinforced by literature, art, and later, film. The Role of Stereotypes in Roma Persecution One of the most enduring and harmful depictions of the Roma came from Victor Hugo’s novel The Man Who Laughs  and its 1928 German Expressionist film adaptation. In it, Roma are portrayed as “comprachicos,” a fictional group who buy and mutilate children to turn them into beggars. This grotesque and completely fabricated idea fuelled fears about the Roma being dangerous and predatory. Stories like these laid the foundation for real-world prejudice, shaping the way societies viewed Roma communities for generations. But while stereotypes painted the Roma as dangerous, the reality was that they were far more often the victims than the villains. The Forgotten Holocaust During World War II, the Nazis targeted Roma as part of their racial purity policies. They were labelled as “undesirable” and deported to concentration camps, where they faced starvation, forced labour, and mass executions. Historians estimate that around 500,000 Romani people were murdered in what some have called the “forgotten Holocaust.” Unlike Jewish survivors, who were eventually acknowledged and compensated, the Roma received little recognition for their suffering. In postwar Europe, they were once again pushed to the margins, their voices unheard, their history ignored. Even in the decades that followed, efforts to assimilate Roma communities often did more harm than good. Attempts to Erase Roma Culture In Communist Eastern Europe, governments sought to “modernise” the Roma, forcing them into fixed housing, outlawing their traditional trades, and sending their children to schools where they faced bullying and discrimination. These policies stripped many Roma of their cultural identity while never fully integrating them into mainstream society. It was during this period that Czech-born photographer Josef Koudelka began documenting Roma communities across Europe. In the 1960s and 70s, he travelled across Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary, France, and Spain, living among the Roma, sleeping in their camps, and capturing their way of life through his lens. His photographs, later published in Gypsies , provided a rare and intimate look at Roma culture—not as outsiders saw them, but as they truly were. Challenging Stereotypes Through Art Koudelka’s work broke away from the usual narratives of poverty and crime, instead focusing on the love, joy, and resilience within Roma families. His images captured moments of celebration, quiet reflection, and deep connection, showing a people whose culture was rich, complex, and deeply human. With the help of sociologist Will Guy, Koudelka’s photographs were accompanied by text that provided historical context, pushing back against the simplistic and often negative portrayals of the Roma that had persisted for centuries. The Roma Today: A Struggle for Recognition But even today, the Roma remain one of the most marginalised groups in Europe. They still face discrimination in housing, employment, and education. In some countries, Roma children are placed in separate, lower-quality schools, limiting their opportunities for the future. Many Roma communities struggle with poverty, but rather than addressing systemic issues, governments often reinforce stereotypes, blaming the Roma for their own exclusion. Understanding the Roma Beyond a Single Story Mikey Walsh’s memoir is just one man’s experience, and it is an important one. His story sheds light on the darker aspects of Romani life, particularly the rigid traditions and cycles of violence that exist in some families. But his is not the only Romani story. To truly understand the Roma, we have to look beyond a single narrative. Their culture is not just one of hardship and suffering—it is also one of strength, endurance, and an unbreakable sense of community.

The pages of musical history are littered with figures who operated just outside the limelight — people whose names may not be instantly recognisable but who left an indelible mark on some of the biggest stars of their time. Cathy Smith was one of those figures. Her story weaves through the decades of rock, folk, and comedy history, touching everyone from The Band to Gordon Lightfoot, Keith Richards, and, most infamously, John Belushi. At times a muse, at others a reckless enabler, Smith's influence was undeniable, often with devastating consequences. Born in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, in 1947, Cathy Smith's life could have taken a very different path. She first emerged in the 1960s as a backing singer and a fixture on the fringes of the Toronto music scene. But she was more than just another hopeful looking for her break, she had an undeniable magnetism that drew her into the inner circles of rock royalty. The Band, Levon Helm and the Toronto Scene Smith's first significant relationship in the music world was with Levon Helm, the powerhouse drummer of The Band. Helm's gritty, soulful approach to music was matched by his equally intense personal life, and Smith fit right into that orbit. Their relationship was passionate and tumultuous, and it was through Helm that Smith began rubbing shoulders with some of the biggest names in music. The Band, who had gained international fame as Bob Dylan's backing group before striking out on their own with seminal albums like Music from Big Pink and The Band, were at the height of their powers during Smith's time with Helm. Smith became embedded in the heart of this musical world, her connections growing as her reputation as a fascinating, free-spirited personality spread through rock circles. But Smith was not content to remain in the background. Her talent for forming connections with influential musicians was matched by a charisma that made her a sought-after presence at some of the most iconic events in rock history. She is said to have been present at The Last Waltz, the legendary 1976 farewell concert by The Band, which was filmed by Martin Scorsese. This was not just a concert, it was a pivotal moment in rock history, and Smith was there, a silent witness to the close of an era. Gordon Lightfoot and the Inspiration for Sundown By the early 1970s, Smith had moved on to another high-profile Canadian musician: folk legend Gordon Lightfoot. Their relationship was the very definition of stormy. While Lightfoot was celebrated for his poetic, melancholic ballads, his personal life was often chaotic. Smith became his muse — though not always in the romantic sense. His 1974 number-one hit "Sundown" was widely believed to be about her, a brooding, ominous track that reached the top of both the US and Canadian charts and stayed on the Billboard Hot 100 for 23 weeks. Lightfoot later confirmed the song was written during one of their most turbulent periods, when he suspected her of being unfaithful while he was away touring. The opening line — "I can see her looking fast in her faded jeans / She's a hard-loving woman, got me feeling mean" — was Lightfoot's portrait of Smith at her most unpredictable. Smith was named in his divorce proceedings, cementing her role as a disruptive force in his life. Had things gone differently, Smith could have remained a notorious but relatively obscure figure in Canadian music circles. Instead, her life took a much darker turn. Moving to Los Angeles: Keith Richards and the Rolling Stones In 1978, Smith relocated from Toronto to Los Angeles, in her own words "to graduate from folk-music groupie to the more dangerous world of rock and roll." She fell in with the orbit of Keith Richards and the Rolling Stones, who were then at the height of their own well-documented excess. The Stones' infamous summer at Villa Nellcôte in 1971 had by then passed into legend, but the lifestyle it represented had not. Smith became known in these circles as "Silverbag" - a nickname derived from the metallic purse she habitually carried, which regulars understood contained drugs. She sang backup for Hoyt Axton for a time and also hung out with Keith Richards and other members of the Stones, providing drugs to those who wanted them. It was during this Los Angeles period that she first crossed paths with John Belushi. They met through Wood and Richards. Belushi later contacted her directly to purchase the drugs that would kill him. John Belushi and the Final Five Days By early 1982, John Belushi was in serious trouble. At 33, he was one of the most recognisable comedians in the world, having come to prominence on Saturday Night Live and achieved genuine movie stardom with Animal House and The Blues Brothers. But he'd been battling cocaine addiction for years, and in the weeks before his death, his behaviour had become erratic and alarming to those around him. He wasn't a regular heroin user, though he'd used it infrequently before. Smith was with him for the last five days of his life, spending much of that time in his bungalow at the Chateau Marmont. On the night of 4 March 1982, Belushi was visited by several people at the bungalow, including Robert De Niro and Robin Williams. Both visits were brief. According to Bob Woodward's book Wired, published in 1984, Williams was "creeped out" by Smith, whom he considered a "lowlife," and left quickly. De Niro also departed without staying long, though he reportedly telephoned the hotel repeatedly the following morning as rumours began to spread. Neither man had any way of knowing what was about to happen. Smith later claimed she injected Belushi with 11 speedballs that night, a speedball being a combination of cocaine and heroin. At around 8am on 5 March 1982, a room service waiter delivered breakfast to the bungalow. Smith signed for it. Belushi was in bed, reportedly snoring. Later that morning, Smith left. At 12.30pm, Belushi's personal trainer Bill Wallace arrived for a scheduled workout and found him dead. He had been dead for several hours. The Death and Initial Confusion Cathy Smith was one of the last people to see John Belushi alive. After Belushi's death, the initial investigation by law enforcement ruled it an accidental drug overdose, with Smith released after initial questioning. The full story of what happened that night, including the visits from Williams and De Niro and the timeline of events, is covered in detail in our dedicated article on John Belushi's final hours at the Chateau Marmont. The National Enquirer Confession and its Consequences After the police released her on the morning of 5 March, Smith took her lawyer's advice and went to St Louis to avoid the press. Discovered there, she flew back to Los Angeles, then travelled to New York, and eventually returned to Toronto. She was back in Canada and seemingly safe when, four months after Belushi's death, the National Enquirer published its June 1982 issue with her face on the front page. Smith had sold the story for $15,000. The headline read: "I Killed John Belushi." In the interview, given to reporters Tony Brenna and Larry Haley, she said: "I didn't mean to. But I was responsible for his death. I didn't feel responsible for John's death at the time because I didn't feel anything. I was loaded, really high on heroin. But now I know it was my fault." The interview reopened the case entirely. The Los Angeles Police Department launched a fresh investigation. In 1983, a grand jury indicted Smith on one count of second-degree murder and 13 counts of administering a dangerous drug. The Enquirer reporters refused to testify at the subsequent trial and were threatened with imprisonment by Judge Brian Crahan, who later vacated the contempt order. The prosecution argued that the Enquirer had itself handed over interview tapes to the grand jury in 1982, effectively waiving the reporters' privilege. Smith fought extradition from Canada for three years before voluntarily returning to Los Angeles in June 1986 and accepting a plea bargain. Trial, Sentencing and Deportation But then Cathy Smith made a shocking move, she gave an interview to the National Enquirer, in which she admitted, "I killed John Belushi. I didn't mean to, but I am responsible." That admission set off a media firestorm. Smith was charged with involuntary manslaughter, as well as multiple drug-related offences. Her trial was highly publicised, and in 1986, she was sentenced to 15 months at the California Institution for Women. After her release in 1988, Smith was deported back to Canada, where she tried to rebuild her life. She worked as a legal secretary and even campaigned against drug use for a time. However, the pull of her old habits was strong, by 1991, she was found in possession of heroin once again. The Books, the Film and the Legacy In 1984, while still in Canada and fighting extradition, Smith co-wrote a memoir called Chasing the Dragon, the title a reference to her heroin addiction. The same year, Bob Woodward published Wired: The Short Life and Fast Times of John Belushi, which drew extensively on interviews with Smith and placed her at the centre of the narrative. In 1989, Wired was adapted into a film in which Patti D'Arbanville played Smith. The film was poorly received and is largely forgotten today, but it kept Smith's name in circulation long after she might otherwise have faded from view. Although Smith remained a figure of interest due to her connection with Belushi, she largely faded from public view in the decades that followed. She died on 16 August 2020 in Maple Ridge, British Columbia, aged 73, having been in failing health for several years. No official cause of death was given. The Globe and Mail described her simply as "a notorious, colourful footnote in pop culture history." The reality was more complicated than a footnote. Smith had been at the centre of some of the defining cultural moments of the 1960s and 1970s: Levon Helm and The Band, Gordon Lightfoot at his commercial peak, the Rolling Stones at their most excessive, and Saturday Night Live's most famous casualty. She was present when history was being made, and she shaped it, for better and considerably for worse, more than most people who never appeared on a stage or screen. Sources: 1. Wikipedia: Cathy Smith. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_Smith 2. The Globe and Mail: Cathy Smith, who admitted to killing John Belushi, was a woman of mystery. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/music/article-mystery-woman-admitted-i-killed-john-belushi/ 3. Ante Meridiem Press: Smith, who injected Belushi with fatal drugs, dies. https://www.avpress.com/news/smith-who-injected-belushi-with-fatal-drugs-dies/article_61faabda-f0ae-11ea-9846-4b85ac22848f.html 4. American Songwriter: Remembering Cathy Smith. https://americansongwriter.com/remembering-cathy-smith-the-woman-behind-classic-rock-hits-and-a-famous-comedians-death/ 5. UPI Archives: National Enquirer reporter subpoenaed in Smith case, 1985. https://www.upi.com/amp/Archives/1985/03/19/A-National-Enquirer-reporter-who-interviewed-Cathy-Evelyn-Smith/5559480056400/ 6. Woodward, Bob. Wired: The Short Life and Fast Times of John Belushi. Simon & Schuster, 1984.

Robert Franklin Stroud, better known as the "Birdman of Alcatraz," was a man whose life was defined by violence, isolation, and an extraordinary dedication to birds. A convicted murderer, ornithologist, and author, Stroud spent 54 years behind bars, including 42 in solitary confinement. His transformation from a violent inmate to a respected expert in avian pathology remains one of the most unusual stories in American criminal history. His life became widely known due to the 1962 film  Birdman of Alcatraz , starring Burt Lancaster, which romanticized his story and painted him as a misunderstood intellectual, though those who knew him in prison described a far more dangerous and manipulative individual. Early Life and a Descent into Crime Born on January 28, 1890, in Seattle, Washington, Stroud was the eldest child of Elizabeth Jane (née McCartney) and Benjamin Franklin Stroud. His mother had two daughters from a previous marriage, and his father was an abusive alcoholic. Stroud ran away from home at the age of 13 to escape the violence, fending for himself on the streets. Stroud in 1912 At 18, he arrived in Cordova, Alaska, where he met 36-year-old Kitty O'Brien, a prostitute and dance-hall entertainer. Stroud acted as her pimp in Juneau, making a living from her earnings. On January 18, 1909, he confronted bartender F.K. "Charlie" von Dahmer after the man allegedly refused to pay O'Brien for her services and physically assaulted her. A struggle ensued, and Stroud shot von Dahmer to death. Reports suggest that he first knocked the man unconscious before fatally shooting him. As Alaska was then a U.S. territory, Stroud was prosecuted in federal court, convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to 12 years in prison at McNeil Island Penitentiary in Washington. However, his time in prison was anything but uneventful. A Notoriously Violent Inmate Stroud quickly developed a reputation as one of the most violent prisoners at McNeil Island. He frequently fought with staff and inmates, once stabbing a fellow prisoner who had reported him for stealing food. He also assaulted a hospital orderly who had caught him attempting to obtain morphine through threats. After another violent altercation, he was sentenced to an additional six months and transferred to Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary in Kansas in 1912. At Leavenworth, Stroud’s volatile temper did not improve. On March 26, 1916, he fatally stabbed guard Andrew Turner through the heart after Turner reprimanded him over a minor rule violation. This incident meant Stroud would miss a scheduled visit with his younger brother, which enraged him. Convicted of first-degree murder, he was sentenced to death by hanging in 1918. His mother, Elizabeth, who had always advocated for him, successfully petitioned President Woodrow Wilson to commute his sentence to life in prison. However, Leavenworth’s warden, T.W. Morgan, opposed the decision and persuaded the authorities to keep Stroud in permanent solitary confinement. Stroud in the 1920s The Birdman of Leavenworth While in solitary confinement at Leavenworth, Stroud’s life took an unexpected turn. In 1920, he discovered a nest with three injured sparrows in the prison yard and nursed them back to health. This sparked an obsession with birds, leading him to breed and study canaries. Prisoners were sometimes allowed to keep birds, and Stroud acquired more, turning his cell into an aviary. Leavenworth’s administration changed, and the new warden, William Biddle, saw an opportunity to present the prison as progressive. He provided Stroud with cages, chemicals, and stationery, allowing him to conduct serious research. Over the years, Stroud raised nearly 300 canaries and became an expert in avian diseases. His first book,  Diseases of Canaries , was smuggled out and published in 1933, gaining him respect among ornithologists. A revised edition,  Stroud's Digest on the Diseases of Birds , followed in 1943, containing even more detailed research. Stroud’s work was groundbreaking. He developed cures for avian hemorrhagic septicemia and ran a successful business selling his bird medicines from within prison. However, his activities created logistical problems. Due to prison regulations, every letter he sent or received had to be reviewed, which required a full-time staff member. Additionally, his birds were permitted to fly freely within his cell, making hygiene a major concern. In 1931, an attempt was made to shut down his bird operation, but Stroud’s supporters launched a massive letter-writing campaign, collecting 50,000 signatures in a petition to President Herbert Hoover. As a result, he was allowed to keep his birds and was even given an additional cell to house them. However, his letter-writing privileges were restricted. Stroud’s interactions with the public deepened when he formed a business relationship with a bird researcher, Della Mae Jones, who moved to Kansas and helped sell his bird medicines. In 1933, he publicly claimed he was not receiving royalties from his books, angering his publisher and prison officials. When authorities sought to transfer him, he discovered a Kansas law that prevented the relocation of married prisoners. To exploit this, he married Jones by proxy, which only further infuriated prison officials. The Transfer to Alcatraz Prison officials had long sought to remove Stroud, and they finally found their opportunity in 1942 when it was discovered that he had been using laboratory equipment to distill alcohol. Citing his "dangerous tendencies," authorities ordered his transfer to Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary. He was given just ten minutes' notice before leaving, with no chance to bring his birds or equipment. Stroud arrived at Alcatraz on December 19, 1942, becoming inmate No. 594. Unlike Leavenworth, Alcatraz’s strict policies meant he was not permitted to keep birds. Stripped of his former life, he spent six years in segregation before being moved to the prison hospital, where he remained for the next 11 years. Stroud in his hospital cell The Battle of Alcatraz In May 1946, Alcatraz witnessed one of its most infamous escape attempts, the Battle of Alcatraz. Stroud, then 56 years old, played a role in protecting inmates during the siege. Climbing over the third-tier railing, he dropped to the second tier and began closing the solid steel doors of the isolation cells to shield prisoners from gunfire. He shouted warnings to the warden that innocent men would die if the guards continued firing into D Block. Stroud, 1959 Birdman of Alcatraz's Later Years and Death At Alcatraz, Stroud turned to legal studies and wrote  Looking Outward: A History of the U.S. Prison System , though authorities blocked its publication. He was diagnosed as a psychopath by prison psychiatrist Romney M. Ritchey, with an IQ of 112. In 1959, with his health failing, Stroud was transferred to the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri, where he remained until his death on November 21, 1963, at the age of 73. Legacy and Cultural Depictions Stroud’s life was romanticized in Thomas E. Gaddis’ 1955 book  Birdman of Alcatraz , later adapted into the 1962 film starring Burt Lancaster. However, former inmates and guards disputed this portrayal, stating that the real Stroud was a manipulative and dangerous individual. Despite this, Stroud remains a paradoxical figure. His contributions to ornithology were genuine, yet his violent past and manipulative nature paint a more complex picture than the public image suggests. The legend of the Birdman of Alcatraz continues to intrigue to this day.

On June 20th, 1938, pedestrians near bustling Herald Square in Midtown Manhattan were treated to a scene right out of a dime store novel. A well-dressed middle-aged woman was wrestling with a man, attempting to subdue him. He pushed her in the face, but she retaliated, knocking him into submission with a swing of her long-strapped pocketbook. The man, a suspected jewel thief, was fortunate she had not used the gun tucked carefully into the folds of her dress. “Well, I got him,” she told two patrolmen who rushed to the scene, “and I can take him in myself.” This was Mary ‘Dead Shot’ Shanley, the NYPD’s fourth-ever female detective, a crime-fighting force of nature credited with over 1,000 arrests. A fearless and unyielding officer, Shanley made history as the first female NYPD detective to use a firearm in the line of duty. A woman of formidable presence, she once subdued a suspect armed only with her pocketbook. She was not just an officer; she was a legend in her own time. Early Life and Path to Law Enforcement Mary ‘Dead Shot’ Shanley was born in Ireland in 1896. Her family immigrated to America, and in 1931, the boisterous and brave Mary joined the NYPD. This was an unusual step for a woman of her time, though not unheard of. During the first half of the 20th century, policewomen in America often worked undercover, on so-called “women’s beats.” “They are called upon regularly to trail or trap mashers, shoplifters, pickpockets, and fortune-tellers; to impersonate drug addicts and hardened convicts, to expose criminal medical practice, find lost persons, guide girls in trouble, break up fake matrimonial bureaus and perform special detective duty,” wrote the New York Times. Mary quickly found herself in the NYPD pickpocket squad, where she would spend most of her career. By the time of her retirement in 1957, she would be a first-grade detective, with over 1,000 arrests under her belt. The Dead Shot Mary Persona Unlike many of her contemporaries, who preferred subtlety, Shanley was not shy about using her gun. Her willingness to draw her weapon, when necessary, earned her the nickname “Deadshot Mary.” She became something of a media sensation, with newspapers eagerly covering her exploits. One memorable case involved Shanley chasing a racketeer through the crowded streets of Fifth Avenue, gun in hand, before bringing him down—much to the astonishment of onlookers. In 1931, Shanley made headlines when she arrested an innovative fortune-teller named Princess Juniata Flynn. According to a New York Times report: Policewoman Shanley…unwrapped a striped bandanna handkerchief from the head of the ‘Princess,’ revealing a telephone headset resting snugly against her ears. The basket into which written questions were put revealed a false bottom, leading to an assistant who telephoned the inquiries to the seer, who would repeat the questions, amazing her clients. Undercover policewomen would visit fortune-tellers, and after paying for their readings, arrest them. Shanley was particularly adept at exposing scams and bringing fraudsters to justice. Becoming the First Female NYPD Officer to Fire a Gun on Duty In December 1934, a change came to the NYPD. The 140 or so female police officers on the force were now required to carry guns (the practice had been voluntary before) when they prowled department stores, shopping centers, and crowded entertainment areas. They were issued 16-ounce revolvers, which were half the weight of the guns policemen carried, and were required to take target practice. “On the practice range in headquarters’ basement some of the women have proved more gun-shy than others,” a reporter patronizingly wrote. “But none has figured in an ‘I didn’t know it was loaded’ mishap. Neither has any hit the bullseye ten times in a row for a perfect 100, though several have broken 80.” A few years later, Mary became the first policewoman in the history of the NYPD to use a gun during a capture and arrest when she fired into the air while pursuing a racketeer on 53rd Street. Around this time, local papers began to report on her exploits, amazed that a five-foot-eight, 160-pound woman had the strength to subdue grown men, sometimes two at a time! “Mary Shanley ordered two suspicious characters, neither of them weaklings, into the lobby of the Longacre Building in Times Square shortly after 10 o’clock last night,” the New York Times reported breathlessly. “They complied, for everything in the policewoman’s mien indicated determination—even the firm grasp of her right hand on her service pistol.” A Career Marked by Controversy and Comebacks In 1941, Shanley put her entire career in jeopardy when she shot her revolver while off duty and intoxicated in a bar in Jackson Heights, Queens. She was demoted from first-grade detective to policewoman and placed under suspension, but returned to duty after only a month and was later promoted to her original position. Shanley was supremely confident in her abilities as a police officer. In an interview with Panama City Herald, she said: “I can usually tell in 20 minutes whether a suspect is legitimate or not.” Deadshot Mary's Later Years and Legacy As Mary got older, she didn’t lose her tough edge. In 1950, she was working at a Macy’s store in Queens when a 22-year-old mentally ill man burst into the store brandishing a .32 caliber automatic pistol. As customers ducked for cover behind display counters, Mary quietly approached the man from behind, gun in hand, and snapped, “Drop that gun, boy.” The gun fell to the floor, and the man was arrested. Three years later, she was casing St. Patrick’s Cathedral, trailing a woman and man who were stealing pocketbooks at the church altar. When she attempted to arrest them, the woman began to pull and claw at Mary so her partner could get away. Mary fired warning shots to stop the man, terrifying shoppers on Fifth Avenue. This was a signature Mary move—firing her service weapon into the air instead of maiming a fleeing person. (This was before firing into the air became illegal in most states.) Mary Shanley retired from the NYPD in 1957, after more than a quarter-century on the police force. She spent the rest of her life in the state where New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia had singled her out for demonstrating “not only keen intelligence and fine police work but also courage at a moment when courage was needed.” Her niece, Mary Shanley Mullins, explained what motivated her aunt, who died in 1989 at the age of 93 and is buried in Long Island. “She was not interested in a husband. She enjoyed her life. She had her freedom and her good salary. She was just different. She was very outspoken, very opinionated. She didn’t fit in then as well as she probably would now. She was born too soon.”

If you found yourself in Chicago in 1977 and wandered into a small drinking establishment at 731 N. Wells Street, you might have thought you’d stumbled into just another neighbourhood tavern. The place had all the hallmarks of a typical bar—a jukebox, a cash register, the comforting clink of glasses, and the faint hum of small talk. But this wasn’t an ordinary watering hole. This was  The Mirage Tavern , a cleverly engineered undercover operation designed to expose corruption in city and state regulatory departments. The Mirage was not owned by a shadowy syndicate or a group of seasoned bar owners looking to make their mark on the Chicago nightlife scene. Instead, it was purchased in May 1977 by an unusual duo— Chicago Sun-Times  journalist Pam Zekman and Better Government Association (BGA) chief investigator Bill Recktenwald, who posed as Mr. and Mrs. Ray Patterson. Their goal? To investigate the widespread allegations that small businesses in Chicago were routinely shaken down by city inspectors, forced to pay bribes to overlook code violations, or risk bureaucratic hell. Setting the Trap The Mirage was the brainchild of an editorial team consisting of James Hoge, Ralph Otwell, Stuart H. Loory, and Joseph Reilly, all determined to find a way to capture corruption in action. They knew that reporting on bribery was one thing, but documenting it with irrefutable proof was another. So they set up an elaborate operation, placing undercover reporters and investigators in key roles. Pam Zekman and Bill Recktenwald posed as the new bar owners. Zay N. Smith, a Sun-Times reporter, played the role of the bartender. Jeff Allen, an investigator with the BGA, took on the role of the tavern manager. Gene Pesek and Jim Frost, Sun-Times photographers, disguised themselves as repairmen. They had an important job: capturing the corruption as it happened, taking photographs from a hidden section of the bar built above the washrooms. With everything in place, the team simply had to wait for the city’s inspectors to come calling—and they didn’t have to wait long. In one of the secret compartments, taking evidence. Corruption, Chicago-Style It turned out that city inspectors operated under a remarkably predictable system, one the journalists would later dub the  “supermarket approach to graft” —low prices, high volume. The shakedowns were usually small, rarely more than $100, but they happened frequently and across multiple agencies. It was clear that these officials weren’t looking for one big payday but rather a steady flow of illicit income. Building inspector receives a $15 bribe at the Mirage Tavern Among those caught in the sting were: A city electrical inspector, who was more than happy to ignore dangerously faulty wiring for the right price. A fire department lieutenant, who signed off on the bar’s grand opening despite  exposed electrical wires hanging from the rafters  and  piles of flammable trash in the basement . A city health inspector, who ignored the  maggots  in the bar and didn’t mind that the  sink drains emptied directly onto the basement floor . A state liquor inspector, who was unfazed by  fruit flies buzzing around the liquor bottles . A fire inspector taking a payment The Mirage also uncovered illegal kickbacks from  A.A. Swingtime Music Company , which controlled the placement of pinball machines and jukeboxes in bars, as well as rampant tax fraud. One of the most egregious figures in the operation was Philip J. Barasch, a local accountant who gave the new bar owners an in-depth tutorial on tax evasion. He walked them through the process of keeping two sets of books—one real, one fake—to skim profits and avoid paying taxes. He even advised them on when inspectors typically showed up and how much their bribes would cost. Barasch’s most cynical piece of advice? Avoid paying off police officers, because  “if you pay off a cop, they keep coming around every month, like flies, looking for a payoff.” The accountant explaining how to get away without paying tax The Fallout: A Citywide Scandal In 1978, the  Chicago Sun-Times  and the  Better Government Association  published a 25-part exposé detailing every shady deal, every bribe accepted, and every inspector caught on camera looking the other way. It was explosive. The series pulled back the curtain on a system so deeply entrenched in corruption that it was practically standard operating procedure. The response was swift. Outraged citizens demanded change, and for once, change actually came. The federal government, the IRS, and the Illinois Department of Revenue all launched investigations. Some key outcomes of the Mirage sting included: The IRS sent 20 agents to investigate tax fraud in cash businesses. The Illinois Department of Revenue created the Mirage Audit Unit, a new investigative body focused on tax evasion. The city was forced to revise its code enforcement procedures and tighten oversight on inspections. A federal investigation into the findings led to indictments of one-third of Chicago’s electrical inspectors in 1978, with more coming in later years. Despite the undeniable impact of the investigation, the  Chicago Sun-Times  was controversially denied a Pulitzer Prize for the exposé. The Pulitzer board, led by  Washington Post  editor Ben Bradlee, refused to honour the series on the grounds that the journalists had used  deception  to obtain their evidence. While the decision remains a debated one, it did not diminish the impact of the investigation itself. The Mirage’s Legacy Though it started as a manufactured sting operation, the Mirage Tavern became something of a legend in Chicago journalism. Its impact was real, its findings damning, and its legacy lasting. Over time, the bar changed hands multiple times, undergoing renovations and rebranding efforts. Today, the building houses The Brehon Pub, a far cry from the grungy, corruption-ridden Mirage of the 1970s. While the  Sun-Times  team might never have gotten their Pulitzer, their work remains one of the most audacious and effective pieces of investigative journalism in modern history. They set out to document corruption, and they did so in a way that made it impossible to ignore. For Chicagoans of a certain generation, The Mirage Tavern isn’t just the name of a long-gone bar. It’s a reminder that, sometimes, the best way to catch a crook is to let them think they’re the one running the con.